[1153]

This is my OUI format:
1 Observation of unlawful/impaired operation(weaving,speeding,etc.)
2 Observation of impairment(odor of alcoholic beverage,bloodshot eyes,slurred speach,flush face)
3 Observation of conduct while producing lic/reg(can't find lic,fumbling,etc.)
4 Ask suspect if they have consumed an alcoholic beverage. If yes, how many, if responds couple or few ask what does a few mean.
5 Request suspect to perform FST ask any medical/health issues that would affect balance/coordination. Also ask if suspect wears glasses/contacts.
6 Demonstrate FST
7 FST performance 1st HGN(note stimulus in report and number of clues observed out of a possible 6 and that 4 or more is considered a failure), 2nd Walk and turn(note line used, level surface, free of debris and no wind if true as well as number of clues observed out of a possble 8 and that 2 or more is considered a failure), 3rd One leg stand( note number of clue observed out of a possible 4 and or more is considered a failure)
8 Clink, tow and on to Intox 5000.
9 Write report quickly afterwards noting as many details as possible(helps a lot at trial months later)

 

[1153]

yeah it has been a while

 

[1153]

:lol: I hope I got the clues right :roll:

 

[1153]

I rely on the "posthumous" examination of the offender for BAC!

I'm sure that doesn't lead to many trials!

 

[1153]

Gil
If are able to identify/get a statement from the civilian who called in the erratic operation, that will help your case, especially if you didn't observe impaired operation/had limited opportunity. Post arrest FST usually are useless in court, but since he requested them it has a small chance.
Goodluck

 

[1153]

If they refuse to give their info...no BOLO. :shock:

Great policy from a prosecution aspect but I have seen plenty of cases where a BOLO is sent out from an anonymous caller and the case gets kicked in court or on appeal.