:shock: What?!!! You mean I just wasted $22 bucks, I thought I could drive worldwide with the license sent to me by http://www.idl-international.com/Hunter said:Not to be sarcastic but there worthless.
This Officer (Harley387) is a gentleman and scholar. I could not have said it better myself. The foreign licence from a recognized country is good for a year to drive here in go old Assachusetts. Mind you a license from another US state is only good for 30 days to drive here in the peoples republic of Ass. What drunk liberal politician thought this up, we will never know. HUMMMMM let see which one has more credibility a New Hampshire license or an Saudi Arabian license? PS Mazz I use to be one of those officers who Harley describes as scratching my head and say have a nice day but now I know from trial and error I just tow and cite them for 90/10 (I only file a criminal complaint and not an arrest just in case the license is legit so I wont be accused of false arrest) Good Luck!! :L:Harley387 said:Internation Driver's Licenses have been discussed here at length in the past. You should try doing a search. In summary, They are good only for toilet paper. They are meaningless unless the operator has a valid license from his own country, and that country must be recognized by our registry. There is a list of these countries someplace (sorry I don't know where). Generally speaking, dirt-bags will try to pass these off as a legit license. You would be suprised how many guys just scratch their heads, and hand the paper back and say, please slow down, have a nice day. I once got one that had 7 or 8 violations written on the back of it! The bottom line is, if someone hands you an International Driver's License, but does not have a valid license elsewhere, lock em up, and or cite them for 90/10. Also, an out-of-state operator with no license IN POSESSION can be arrested under 90/10. Hope this answers your question.
"This has 'International Incident' written all over it!" :L: :L: :L:BHCCPD said:If the car is registered to the driver in question who is driving on a foreign license and it is registered in Massachusetts. Bingo as far as I am concern the established residency. Tow and cite 90/10.
Why, thank you. I have been called lots of things in my time, but this is a first. LOL!BHCCPD said:This Officer (Harley387) is a gentleman and scholar. I could not have said it better myself. :L:Harley387 said:Internation Driver's Licenses have been discussed here at length in the past. You should try doing a search. In summary, They are good only for toilet paper. They are meaningless unless the operator has a valid license from his own country, and that country must be recognized by our registry. There is a list of these countries someplace (sorry I don't know where). Generally speaking, dirt-bags will try to pass these off as a legit license. You would be suprised how many guys just scratch their heads, and hand the paper back and say, please slow down, have a nice day. I once got one that had 7 or 8 violations written on the back of it! The bottom line is, if someone hands you an International Driver's License, but does not have a valid license elsewhere, lock em up, and or cite them for 90/10. Also, an out-of-state operator with no license IN POSESSION can be arrested under 90/10. Hope this answers your question.
You'd summons for this when on another thread you advocate arresting for operating to endanger when coupled with 90-18 as a breach of the peace? This seems a little out of whack to me.BHCCPD said:PS Mazz I use to be one of those officers who Harley describes as scratching my head and say have a nice day but now I know from trial and error I just tow and cite them for 90/10 (I only file a criminal complaint and not an arrest just in case the license is legit so I wont be accused of false arrest) Good Luck!! :L:
Oh BOY :-({|= :-({|= :-({|= If you read the statement you would not be asking me this question TROUTDFP2662 said:You'd summons for this when on another thread you advocate arresting for operating to endanger when coupled with 90-18 as a breach of the peace? This seems a little out of whack to me.BHCCPD said:PS Mazz I use to be one of those officers who Harley describes as scratching my head and say have a nice day but now I know from trial and error I just tow and cite them for 90/10 (I only file a criminal complaint and not an arrest just in case the license is legit so I wont be accused of false arrest) Good Luck!! :L:
["DFP2662"]You'd summons for this when on another thread you advocate arresting for operating to endanger when coupled with 90-18 as a breach of the peace? This seems a little out of whack to me.BHCCPD said:PS Mazz I use to be one of those officers who Harley describes as scratching my head and say have a nice day but now I know from trial and error I just tow and cite them for 90/10 (I only file a criminal complaint and not an arrest just in case the license is legit so I wont be accused of false arrest) Good Luck!! :L:
I am aware of that, the point is has anyone here EVER managed to get OTE to fly as a breach of the peace? It hasn't worked in any of the courts I've testified in and the DAs were less than amused. Technically legal, yes. Recommended practice...?Harley387 said:DFP2662 wrote:
My question was more to the point of arresting for operating to endanger and 90-18 (which was SPECIFICALLY stated as a non-arrestable criminal offense in my academy class) versus issuing a criminal summons for a subject with an obvious fake international license. I'm curious how the courts have responded to this enforcement
Well, yes, and no. If the operating to endanger amounts to a breach of the peace, you MAY arrest. :shifty:
This is where your report writing skills will play a big role in court. Though I have not arrested for OTE, I am 90% certain that I could illustrate a breach of the peace to a jury.DFP2662 said:I am aware of that, the point is has anyone here EVER managed to get OTE to fly as a breach of the peace? It hasn't worked in any of the courts I've testified in and the DAs were less than amused. Technically legal, yes. Recommended practice...?Harley387 said:DFP2662 wrote:
My question was more to the point of arresting for operating to endanger and 90-18 (which was SPECIFICALLY stated as a non-arrestable criminal offense in my academy class) versus issuing a criminal summons for a subject with an obvious fake international license. I'm curious how the courts have responded to this enforcement
Well, yes, and no. If the operating to endanger amounts to a breach of the peace, you MAY arrest. :shifty: