[LeadDog17]

Amazing :shock: :shock: :BM: :BM: Oh Ya Kristen Odlaugh uses the LA riot excuse that has become so widely used in California. I was caught up in the emotion of the situation I am not responsible for me own actions. LOL and they call us liberals here in Massachusetts? Hummm

You might want to get some more fact before throwing accusations around. Ms. Odlaugh has been speaking out AGAINST drinking on the job. She made her report to the brass as part of sexual harrasement complaints, which she states are the result of FF's drinking on duty.

 

[LeadDog17]

Well ok Leaddog tell me the facts?? I would like to hear them! First and foremost I did not start this topic. I am only commenting on what I read on fscp's topic. So if you want someone to research the facts you better talk to fscp (the author)

No, you DIDN'T post the article. All you did was read it, spin it, and fill in the blanks with what you wanted so that it you had someone you could hold responsible. NOWHERE in the article does it state that this woman was breaking the rules because of peer pressure ("caught in the emotion"), drinking, or making excuses for actions. All the article does is state that she believes on Dud drinking is "prevalent" in her department. YOU made the leap from that statement to the conclusion that she was one of those participating. Jumping to conclusions like that is dangerous and it's how rumors get started - and in this case, it turns out, it's very unfair to Ms. Odlaugh.

After reading FSCPD's post and your conclusions, I was curious how you had jumped to that conclusion, so I CHECKED. That's how I found the information about her sexual harassment case that she feels was caused by coworkers drinking on duty (as I posted previously). Nothing more, nothing less than what the articles state.

Sorry to sound :BM: about this, but it bothers me a bit when people jump to their own conclusions with incorrect information.