Firearms + Community Caretaking | MassCops

Firearms + Community Caretaking

Discussion in 'Court Decisions' started by Crvtte65, Feb 1, 2008.

  1. Crvtte65

    Crvtte65 Moderator

    COMMONWEALTH vs. Yasmani QUEZADA.
    SJC-09931
    February 1, 2008.
    Firearms. Constitutional Law, Search and seizure. Search and Seizure Emergency, Reasonable suspicion. Protective Custody.

    Kathleen Celio, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

    Frances A. King for the defendant.

    RESCRIPT.

    The defendant has been charged in the Charlestown Division of the Boston Municipal Court Department with unlawful possession of a firearm. G.L. c. 269, § 10 (a ). The firearm was seized from the defendant by a police officer who encountered him on the street in the company of another individual. The officer noticed that the defendant may have been injured and appeared to be "out of it" and "not fully aware of his surroundings." When the officer asked to speak with the defendant, he fled and the officer gave chase. The officer eventually caught and stopped the defendant and discovered the weapon on his person. The facts are recounted in greater detail in Commonwealth v. Quezada, 67 Mass.App.Ct. 693 (2006).

    A judge in the Boston Municial Court allowed the defendant's motion to suppress the firearm. With leave of a single justice of this court, see Mass. R.Crim. P. 15(b), as appearing in 422 Mass. 1501 (1996), the Commonwealth appealed to the Appeals Court. The Appeals Court affirmed the motion judge's ruling, holding that the officer's stop of the defendant was not justified by the so-called community caretaking function; by the protective custody statute, G.L. c. 111B, § 8; or by reasonable suspicion. Commonwealth v. Quezada, supra at 695-697. We then granted the Commonwealth's application for further appellate review.

    Having carefully considered the record, the parties' briefs, the oral arguments, and the supplemental authorities cited by the Commonwealth, we hold that the motion judge's order should be affirmed for essentially the same reasons given by the Appeals Court.

    Order allowing motion to suppress affirmed.
     
  2. PaulKersey

    PaulKersey New Member

     
  3. SPINMASS

    SPINMASS Subscribing Member

    At least its another gun off the street, next they will grant the request for the guy to get the gun back.
     
  4. Hb13

    Hb13 MassCops Member

    Another fu*kstick judge to the rescue of some douchebag as$hole.
    got to love this state.
     

Share This Page