HousingCop said:
From what I am led to believe, the practices at that time were to basically coax the children into saying things they believed happened, actually did happen. Not that I doubt an innocent child at all. I am not a licenced therapist (although I play one on TV) these children were given ideas in their heads and they basically believed what they were told. They then just repeated these thoughts back to the therapist.
Think back to your childhood. I had a friend who believed he was Superman. He actually thought he could fly. Well after he broke his leg jumping off of the garage, he quickly discounted that notion. Kids say and do some strange s#it.
My daughter believes a gorilla now lives in her closet after she saw that one on TV in Franklin Park. I told her it's just MPD61 and he needs to shave real bad!! :L:
Since this has happened, alot has gone into studying this specific case. I saw the piece they did on 60 Minutes a few years back and the methods used then are basically discounted by modern standards.
In the US you have the basic right to face your accuser. The children testified on tapes which were played to the jury. This was to spare these children any further emotional damge as a result. I agree this is a good way to do it but where do you draw the line on this? I am just glad I don't have to make that decision.
Something happened there, I don't know what, but hopefully it's all over for those involved
I agree that something happened, what that was I nor anyone here knows or will ever know. However if what the kids say happened really did happen my heart goes out to them because they have to live with that and what a terrible thing that must be to have to deal with that, I wouldnt wish it on an enemy.
Then theres the other side of the coin, as we all know kids say the darnest things and then theres the fact that the women played a more signifigant role in all of it and one shit the bed and the other is free. Which leads me to think something was really messed up with the whole process from the begining.
I can say this, especially being from the area where this happend, I've heard many rumors over the years and one that one was really prominant was he (tooky) was very adiment from day one he was innocent. And then there those who I know a few of who are reletives of the victims and there story was always kind of cloudy,and didnt seem very concivded he really did anything.
I guess we'll never really know what really happened.