Massachusetts Cop Forum banner

Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
98 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Does anyone know if civil service (or any appointing authority) enforces this law?

G.L. c. 31 § 58 requires that, within nine (9) months of appointment, civil service police officers reside within ten (10) miles of the perimeter (town line) of the municipality. This distance is measured "as the crow flies" from the officer's residence to the town line where he/she is employed.
------
No applicant for examination for original appointment to the police force or fire force of a city or town shall be required by rule or otherwise to be a resident of such city or town at the time of filing application for such examination; provided, however, that notwithstanding the provisions of any general or special law to the contrary, any person who receives an appointment to the police force or fire force of a city or town shall within nine months after his appointment establish his residence within such city or town or at any other place in the commonwealth that is within ten miles of the perimeter of such city or town.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
561 Posts
That second paragraph is slightly confusing - does that mean that a municipality can only require someone who is hired to live within 10 miles of town, as opposed to requiring in-town residency?

-Mike :-k
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
98 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
My understanding is that a municipality can require in-town (or city) residency (i.e. City of Boston). However, this is not a civil service requirement - it is a local requirement which would be imposed by

CBA (contract)
Town By-Law
City Ordinance
Personnel Policy
Departmental Rule or Regulation

There is also another (less restrictive) statute covering non-civil service departments:

G.L. c. 41 - 99A
Any member of the regular police or fire department and fire alarm division of a city or town appointed subsequent to August first, nineteen hundred and seventy-eight shall reside within fifteen miles of the limits of said city or town. Said distance shall be measured from the closest border limits of said city or town in which said member is employed to the closest border limits of the city or town in which said member lives; provided however, if any said city or town by local ordinance or by-law to which the provisions of paragraph (d) of section seven of chapter one hundred and fifty E of the General Laws shall apply, or by collective bargaining agreement shall require the members of a regular police or fire department appointed on or after August first, nineteen hundred and seventy-eight to be residents of such city or town, the provision of such local ordinance, by-law or collective bargaining agreement shall supersede the provision of this section and provided further such local ordinance, by-law or collective bargaining agreement shall apply only to those members of a regular police or fire department appointed subsequent to the adoption of such local ordinance, by-law or collective bargaining agreement.
 

·
Subscribing Member
Joined
·
397 Posts
Haverhill just spent several months slapping this issue around. It all came about over a LT. promotion with the "FireDawgs" . The #1 guy on the list got past over for someone who lived in NH. The #1 guy then raised the issue that the law was not being enforced. At the time Haverhill had a "must reside in the city" ordinance. Since then they agreed along with the unions, and Chiefs of both departments to go with the "crow fly" law.

I recently turned in my application for Haverhill. in it had about a page and ahalf about residency, (plus 3 pages about smoking, and 14 pages probing my life!)

http://www.eagletribune.com/news/stories/20040113/HA_003.htm about the above situation

http://www.eagletribune.com/news/stories/20040114/HA_001.htm Council stating "new law"

Though it does not state it in these article, the law is enforced, but the nine months has not ended in Havehill yet so no one knows IF it is actually enforced. But I wouldn't want to test it with the current administration
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
968 Posts
MK,

Good luck with Haverhill, it is a nice change to finally see things moving for people on this board who have been waiting!
 

·
Subscribing Member
Joined
·
1,167 Posts
MortalKnight,

Is Haverhill still undergoing union issues as they were over the winter? I know the Haverhill christmas parade has caused quite a stir in our department :wink:. Over the winter, I know this was a big issue.
 

·
Subscribing Member
Joined
·
397 Posts
shawnr76, thanks.

PearlOnyx , as far as the union issues, I'm not 100% sure. I know things has quieted down a bit, (or at the least gone back behind close doors). Since the parade we have gotten a new Mayor and new council members. The very fact that they are hiring both reserves and Full-timers must mean that something is going good :shock: .

Either way I'm just happy that I'm getting an opportunity to play with the big boys. 8)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
561 Posts
=D> Way to go, MB!! Make sure you holler at me when you get your academy date for HPD... I am going for TPD (wahoo!) sometime before the end of the year. \:D/

-Mike
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
253 Posts
hey M.K. good luck and congrats......

just remember one thing....

I pay your salary!

hahahahahahahaahhha

also, promise me one thing.... once your on, please control the speeders on Lowell ave! :x
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
98 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Boston Municipal Police Officers have to be residents of Boston.
I think all (if not most) City of Boston employees must reside in the City. They enforce this rule with periodic audits.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top