Joined
·
3,562 Posts
I guess I'm kind of surprised the archaic residency rule still exists in 2023. This rule severely limits the pool the department can draw from. There are many qualified people who live outside the City of Boston who over the years would have liked to get on the job there, myself included.
While I was born in Boston and spent my first few years there, I grew up in the suburbs but when I took the Civil Service tests back in the 80s when I was trying to get on, I was forced to list my town of residency first. Boston was one of the cities we could add after that. That obviously didn't work out.
I'm thankful the City of Los Angeles does not have that rule. In fact, there are a lot of us Bostonians that have been on the job with the LAPD and none of the guys I know, ever lived in the City of LA... Including a guy by the name of Bill Bratton.
Just a thought after reading through this thread.
While I was born in Boston and spent my first few years there, I grew up in the suburbs but when I took the Civil Service tests back in the 80s when I was trying to get on, I was forced to list my town of residency first. Boston was one of the cities we could add after that. That obviously didn't work out.
I'm thankful the City of Los Angeles does not have that rule. In fact, there are a lot of us Bostonians that have been on the job with the LAPD and none of the guys I know, ever lived in the City of LA... Including a guy by the name of Bill Bratton.
Just a thought after reading through this thread.