HAVERHILL — Despite repeated assertions in an internal police investigation released earlier this week that retired state Trooper Charles Noyes was intoxicated at the scene of a March 30 incident near the Rocks Village Bridge on River Road, it appears that Noyes may never face drunken driving charges. City officials said Friday that the incident was so poorly handled by the responding officers from Haverhill and West Newbury that it would be impossible to convict Noyes for driving drunk. Instead, Noyes was charged by West Newbury police with negligent driving and leaving the scene of an accident that caused property damage. He was placed on unsupervised probation for six months. http://www.eagletribune.com/haverhi...charge-likely-in-Haverhill-state-trooper-case
I know what your saying, but those rules are for the frequent flyer repeat offenders. When it's a current or former law enforcement officer, the media doesn't want a little thing like due process of law to get in the way of a juicy story
Just watched VB AKA Fat Boy talk about this case. He is so ignorant its not even funny. I long gave up on OUIs that I didnt see operation on.
The #1 reason I stopped watching Fox 25 in the morning. Numbers 2,3 & 4 are the other twits on the morning show that have opinions without a clue. The only reason it's not 5 reasons is I expect the weather girl to have no idea what she's talking about. I think that's a prerequisite for the job.
It's amazing that people think we just charge people to charge them. Elements are important. If the elememts of the crime aren't there so be it. Are these people advocating we falsely arrest someone? Say they observed operation when they didn't? The courts don't care when you do have operation anyway so why lie about it? Remember the Globe series a few moths ago? Should the Police on scene violate his freedoms under the color of authority by making that arrest just to appease the various advocacy groups and the press? The lawsuit would get him a high 5 figure settlement just for showing up to court. If they didn't have operation, so be it. They still banged him, and his license suspension will be just about the same. It's not like they went old school, locked the keys in the trunk, and drove him home. Nice of Mr. Denner to weigh in too. Schedule a show cause hearing with what evidence? Just to do it? Waste 2 hours of the courts time? I'm probably in the minority on this, but if they had operation, in 2012, if he's taking out phone poles, he needs to go. That's life in the present.
Oh come on. I know for a fact that it's the girl on channel 7 that all you boys like. What's her name? Dylan something?
Yep that's her. I think the next a thread is derailing instead of putting up a picture of a squirrel, I'll just put up a picture of her.
Brothers, let's not even put each other in this type of awkward situation to begin with. If you are out drinking and you feel it hitting you a little too hard, switch to water or soda and have something to eat. Also, know when you should swallow your pride and hand over the keys, or call for a ride. We all owe it to each other.
All this fuss, money spent on investigations, and discipline on a case that would result in the boiler plate CWOF and fines anyway! Even if the media was calling for his head during an OUI trial, there is a graduated sentencing system in the district court. Assuming he, or anyone else for that matter, were convicted of an OUI, and has no record, they start at the lightest sentencing option (pre-trial probation or CWOF), and are supposed to go up the ladder on subsequent charges. We all no the latter doesn't happen though. Where the courts don't take OUI's all that seriously, combined with a multi-jurisdictional mess, (crashed in one town, found in another), negligent operation as a single charge, would appear to be not only proper, but the easiest to prove for a conviction. Plus, there is no need to prove the element of intoxication and negligence is a low standard of culpability. In the end, whether OUI or Negligent Operation was charged, (or both), someone with no record or minimal record, cop or civilian, are looking at - yup a CWOF. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's it in a nutshell.....even if the trooper is guilty as hell, there are no enhanced penalties for the occupation of the defendant.
Officers face possible firing for roles in ex-state trooper crashes HAVERHILL — Two veteran city police officers face disciplinary hearings that could result in lengthy suspensions or firing for their handling of car crashes involving retired state troopers. A third officer has requested a hearing to fight a five-day unpaid suspension for his role in the most recent of the trooper cases. The hearings are scheduled for July 19 at City Hall. Sgt. Harry Miller and Lt. William Leeman were suspended without pay for five days by police Chief Alan DeNaro for their roles in a March crash involving Charles Noyes of Haverhill, former deputy superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police. Both Haverhill officers were cited for writing untruthful or incomplete reports, unsatisfactory job performance and violating the canon of police ethics. http://www.eagletribune.com/haverhi...-firing-for-roles-in-ex-state-trooper-crashes
Thump, thump, thump! What was that Chief? Oh, the bus just drove over three guys, don't mind the rough ride.
The last I checked, the only offenses that have mandated arrest language are violating a protective order and some obscure elections laws concerning interfering with or picketing a polling place......not sure why this is a big deal. I've cut breaks for civilians and cops alike for relatively minor offenses with extenuating circumstances. My favorite example is when I stopped a guy for running a red light, and he was definitely intoxicated. However, he was coming from the funeral reception of his best friend (he even had the funeral program with him listed as giving the eulogy), had a spotless driving record, a Class A CDL with every endorsement you can get (OUI means no more job), was a perfect gentleman, and was less than a mile from his house. No way in hell was I arresting that guy, I parked his car and drove him home. I would hope that anyone, supervisor or civilian, would understand that use of my discretion.
Good on you Delta. He may never work up the nerve to seek you out and thank you in person, but I'm certain that he will be forever grateful. He has probably told his story about the kind and sympathetic Police Officer numerous times.