MassCops - Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network, A Mass Police Web Portal

Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network

Massachusetts Police News, Information and Discussions on MassCops



Pages: 1
Main Page

GPS Tracking Of Sex Offenders

(Click here to view the original thread on the MassCops Message Board)

Posted by: kwflatbed

States move toward lifetime GPS tracking of sex offenders
By DAVID A. LIEB
Associated Press Writer

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo.- Technology that helps the military align targets and motorists find their way is being tapped to track some sex offenders forever.


Spurred by headlines of released sex offenders accused of murder, some states are mandating use of the Global Positioning System for tracking. Many lawmakers see electronic monitoring as a natural evolution of statutes that already require sex offenders to register their addresses with authorities.

At least four states - Florida, Missouri, Ohio and Oklahoma - passed laws this year requiring lifetime electronic monitoring for some sex offenders, even if their sentences would normally have expired. Similar bills have been proposed in Congress and other states.

But some civil-rights experts and defense attorneys contend such requirements are too onerous and attach the stigma and inconvenience of electronic anklets and GPS transmitters to those who may never commit a crime again.

GPS monitoring makes sense for a small group of high-risk offenders, evaluated case-by-case, said John La Fond, a law professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City and author of the recently published book "Preventing Sexual Violence."

"A law that requires that everyone who has committed a crime against a young child should be subject to lifetime locator technology is simply foolish," La Fond said.

After a registered sex offender was charged in March with killing 9-year-old Jessica Lunsford, Florida legislators quickly mandated tougher prison sentences for people who commit sex offenses against children and required lifetime GPS monitoring after serving time.

Missouri Sen. Matt Bartle liked the Florida legislation so much that he copied and expanded it to include repeat sex offenders who commit crimes - such as exposing oneself to a child - that would otherwise be punishable by seven years or less of imprisonment.

Bartle said he intentionally cast a wide net.

"I think the general public is really not terribly confident that we're getting it right when it comes to pedophiles - that this individual case-by-case approach is leading to some very horrific situations," he said.

A new Oklahoma law also requires habitual sex offenders to wear GPS monitoring devices for the rest of their lives. Ohio's budget funds lifetime GPS monitoring only for people classified as sexually violent predators.

Many other states use GPS monitoring for selected people on probation or parole but the monitoring ends with the sentence.

People on the tracking system must wear the electronic waterproof ankle bands at all times and stay within a certain distance from their separate GPS transmitters, which can be carried on belts, in purses or set down on desks and tables when at work or home. The transmitter is about 3 inches long and tall and 1 1/2 inches wide.

Part of what makes the technology attractive is the ability to trigger automatic alerts to law enforcement authorities - by e-mail, cell phone text messages or faxes - anytime sex offenders approach off-limits areas like a school or stray from their designated route between work and home.

Local authorities also have the ability to pinpoint a person's location at any moment - shown as a dot on a computer map that contains street names and the offender's traveling direction and speed.

Pro Tech Monitoring Inc. already uses GPS technology to follow about 5,000 people on parole, probation and house arrest in 38 states, said Richard Nimer, its vice president for business development. He said inquiries about offender tracking services spiked nearly fourfold after Lunsford's death.

The GPS technology is not foolproof, however.

Authorities in Boise, Idaho, say paroled child-sex offender William Lightner cut off a GPS bracelet and fled on July 23. Near Tallahassee, Fla., Kenneth Lamberton was wearing a GPS monitor awaiting a child-molestation trial when authorities allege he tried to force one girl into a sex act in March and another to expose herself in April.

Both men had been assigned passive GPS devices that send information once a day. Florida is switching to the active GPS devices, which instantly alert authorities to any violations.

Florida's experience shows offenders on GPS tracking are less likely to get in trouble than those under traditional supervision. The state Department of Corrections followed about 16,000 offenders placed on community supervision in the 2001-2002 fiscal year, including more than 1,000 under GPS monitoring.

Two years later, the department had revoked the community release of 31 percent of those on GPS monitoring, compared with 44 percent of those under traditional supervision. Nearly 6 percent of GPS-monitored offenders had committed new felonies or misdemeanors, compared with 11 percent of those who were not electronically monitored.

Lifetime electronic monitoring may be preferable to lifelong stints in mental-health institutions, said Jack King of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. But rather than targeting entire categories of criminals, states should mandate it after individual hearings, he said.

Kansas City civil-rights attorney Arthur Benson already is challenging Missouri's lifetime sexual offender registry.

"While these laws are often couched in terms of protecting the public against repeat offenses, at heart they are vengeful, punishing acts," Benson said.

---


Posted by: frapmpd24

I like the idea of knowing where these A-holes are and monitoring their every move with GPS. However, hopefully if these scumbag sex offenders commit crimes the courts are smart enough to SEND THEM AWAY for a long time so there are not that many out roaming the need to track them. Ofcourse, this is the courts were talking about so any rational punishment probably does not get applied.

Afterall, the GPS is good, however it does not let the person monitoring them know exactly what their doing, (ie: reoffending), hence, being behind bars is the best method of control.

Anyone know of any states with jails/prisons with strictly sex offenders? Other than a "treatment" (and I use that term lightly) setting. Just curious how other states are handling the issue.


Posted by: FghtNIrsh17

Quote:
But some civil-rights experts and defense attorneys contend such requirements are too onerous and attach the stigma and inconvenience of electronic anklets and GPS transmitters to those who may never commit a crime again.
KEY WORD IS "MAY" Yea 50/50 chance, but I would rather better my odds with this whole tracking. There is NEVER going to be an end to it, but it can at least be somewhat prevented. Like Frapmpd said, put em away for a long, long, long time.

I would like to see what civil rights people and def attorneys would do if there wife, sister, mother, daughter, son or any female/ child they knew was attacked. Bet they would quit there job or at least stop defending it. Then they will be the first one on congress door demanding harsher penalties. Hipicrates (spelling).

However instead of a device that can go where they "convicted felon" can put it, I suggest them making a permant none removable braclet. They have medical id braclets, put a chip in it, seal to the ankle and make them cut there foot to get it off. With the technology we have these we must be able to produce something that would work. Just my opinion, dont mean to piss off or offend anyone.


Posted by: LenS

Cutting something off would be a good first step in treating sex offenders!




Posted by: spt102

Quote:
Originally Posted by frapmpd24";p=&quot View Post
I like the idea of knowing where these A-holes are and monitoring their every move with GPS. However, hopefully if these scumbag sex offenders commit crimes the courts are smart enough to SEND THEM AWAY for a long time so there are not that many out roaming the need to track them. Ofcourse, this is the courts were talking about so any rational punishment probably does not get applied.

Afterall, the GPS is good, however it does not let the person monitoring them know exactly what their doing, (ie: reoffending), hence, being behind bars is the best method of control.

Anyone know of any states with jails/prisons with strictly sex offenders? Other than a "treatment" (and I use that term lightly) setting. Just curious how other states are handling the issue.
i, do not thank they are aholes they infact have a sicknes which must be treated at a hospetal, and not by gps,s do you, really thank radio waves from gps,s will help behavier maybe drugs will but gps wont i, this writer, beleives that the money would be better


Posted by: LenS

I think that the money would be better spent executing them. That would "cure" them (defined as no longer a threat). But that isn't likely to happen, especially in this state!


Posted by: MSP75

Quote:
Originally Posted by spt102";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by frapmpd24";p=&quot View Post
I like the idea of knowing where these A-holes are and monitoring their every move with GPS. However, hopefully if these scumbag sex offenders commit crimes the courts are smart enough to SEND THEM AWAY for a long time so there are not that many out roaming the need to track them. Ofcourse, this is the courts were talking about so any rational punishment probably does not get applied.

Afterall, the GPS is good, however it does not let the person monitoring them know exactly what their doing, (ie: reoffending), hence, being behind bars is the best method of control.

Anyone know of any states with jails/prisons with strictly sex offenders? Other than a "treatment" (and I use that term lightly) setting. Just curious how other states are handling the issue.
i, do not thank they are aholes they infact have a sicknes which must be treated at a hospetal, and not by gps,s do you, really thank radio waves from gps,s will help behavier maybe drugs will but gps wont i, this writer, beleives that the money would be better
spt102,
Please tell me that you are playing a joke. What is with the spelling on this and other posts? It makes Ebonics look like the Queen's english.


Posted by: CJIS

Quote:
Originally Posted by MSP75";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spt102";p=&quot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by frapmpd24";p=&quot View Post
I like the idea of knowing where these A-holes are and monitoring their every move with GPS. However, hopefully if these scumbag sex offenders commit crimes the courts are smart enough to SEND THEM AWAY for a long time so there are not that many out roaming the need to track them. Ofcourse, this is the courts were talking about so any rational punishment probably does not get applied.

Afterall, the GPS is good, however it does not let the person monitoring them know exactly what their doing, (ie: reoffending), hence, being behind bars is the best method of control.

Anyone know of any states with jails/prisons with strictly sex offenders? Other than a "treatment" (and I use that term lightly) setting. Just curious how other states are handling the issue.
i, do not thank they are aholes they infact have a sicknes which must be treated at a hospetal, and not by gps,s do you, really thank radio waves from gps,s will help behavier maybe drugs will but gps wont i, this writer, beleives that the money would be better
spt102,
Please tell me that you are playing a joke. What is with the spelling on this and other posts? It makes Ebonics look like the Queen's english.

LOL.... I like his spelling it makes me feel better about mine




ma police, boston ma police, massachusetts police, massachusetts police, mass state police, mass police, ma, mass, massachusetts, massachusetts, massachutes, massachusetts law, massachusetts polece, police, officer, police officer, cops, police gear, law enforcement, police duty gear, state police, sheriff, law, police supply, police agency directory, police agency, police department, traffic officer, police dept, state trooper, dispatcher, massachusetts county sheriff, massachusetts sheriff, massachusetts department of corrections, ma doc, doc, dept of corrections, police information, civil service, ma civil service, massachusetts crime, police training, police academy, ma police academy, massachusetts officers, masscop, masscops, mpa, bpa, ibpoa, police association, massachusetts police news, massachusetts crime news, mass most wanted, police career information, police patrol, police administration, police books, crime scene training, police discussion, crime discussions, cops

About MassCops, the home for Massachusetts law enforcement.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network opened in 1998 and is now a part of the New England Police Network The site is a pro-police discussion forum intended for sworn police officers and civilian law enforcement officials as well as those interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement here in Massachusetts.

The goal of The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network is to provide an informal network of law enforcement officials here in Massachusetts for educational and informational purposes.

The forum covers many topics such as Police Related News Articles, Agency & Profession Discussions, Police Training as well as Law Enforcement Career Information.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network and The New England Police Network (NEPN) and it's network sites are privately owned websites/domains and are not affiliated with or endorsed by any government association or agency.

MassCops (masscops.com) and (masscop.com) are privately owned are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Massachusetts Coalition of Police (masscop.org)



vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser

3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 49 50 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108