Originally Posted by Cinderella

The incident occurred, says the Los Angeles woman, as she was putting on a decorative low-rise "v-string", Victoria's
Secret's own version of the g-string, from the "Sexy Little
Thing" line according to a lawsuit filed last week in Los Angeles
Superior Court by Macrida Patterson, 52.

Prior to the lawsuit's filing, Victoria's Secret, famous for its glamorous fashion shows starring the likes of supermodels Giselle, Heidi Klum and Tyra Banks, requested to inspect the offending article, but Patterson's counsel refused.

Originally Posted by USMCTrooper

1. There are two things that should not be in the same sentence "low rise v string sexy little thing" and "Macrida Patterson age 52".

2. Because it is no longer a "sexy little thing" but instead a large stretched out clothesline.

Originally Posted by NewEngland2007

Boo! Hiss! She may very well have been qualified to wear the garment. Just sayin. But what in the bloody hell was sewn on that could take an eye out?

Originally Posted by USMCTrooper

I am willing to bet she tried to defy the laws of physics. She was probably not qualified to wear it and thats how she managed generate enough torque to dislodge a small jewel, propel it upward where it continued with enough force to impact the cornea, then redirect off the cornea and come to an uncontrolled final rest on the floor.

Originally Posted by NewEngland2007

...But what in the bloody hell was sewn on that could take an eye out?

Originally Posted by Thimios315

I have no idea what's sewn on that thing, but I would be more than happy to have this young lady demonstrate a re-enactment for us!!! ^_^