| Originally Posted by John J  Lets say a town has a certification list with 10 names on it. Can that town hire #8 and #9 without even interviewing numbers 1-7? Thanks J |
| Originally Posted by soup How would they hire #8 & 9 without interviewing #1-7? |
| Originally Posted by soup Possible, but not likely. If that is what happened in this case, then there is probably more to the story on the original post. Maybe 1-7 were interviewed before and were bypassed so they could be bypassed without an interview over and over again. If that is the case, the appointing authority can request that their names be forever removed. |
| Originally Posted by resqjyw0 I think 94c would know... |
| Originally Posted by soup Possible, but not likely. If that is what happened in this case, then there is probably more to the story on the original post. Maybe 1-7 were interviewed before and were bypassed so they could be bypassed without an interview over and over again. If that is the case, the appointing authority can request that their names be forever removed. |
| Originally Posted by soup Are you saying that 94c knows specifically about this case in question or just he would know in general. I'm not claiming to know more than someone else, but I have spent the last few years dealing with civil service issues and have learned alot. If a town requests a list, they tell civil service how many people they are hiring and a list is sent. If two are being hired, they get 5 names (at a time). The bypass process is not that easy (unless what 94c said was true in this particular case, bad bops & stealing) The appointing authority must provide "sound and sufficient reasons" for bypass. If someone feels that they were bypassed unfairly, they need to file an appeal. In this case, if 1-7 were bypassed without an interview and #8&9 were hired, there is more to this story. Please say so if you are aware of the whole story here. |
| Originally Posted by soup The appointing authority must provide "sound and sufficient reasons" for bypass. If someone feels that they were bypassed unfairly, they need to file an appeal. |
| Originally Posted by John J In this case there are actually nine names on the list on the list. I was trying to be vague because you never know who is reading this, but oh well here goes. 1-3 are vets, 4 got a score of 10, and 5-9 are tied with a score of nine. The department collected apps and background packets from all nine. They then hired two people from the 5-9 group and 1-4 are in the dark. I was just looking for some insight as to what #4 could do in this situation. How long does a person have to file an appeal. This particular department will be hiring three more in the next year. Poor old #4 does not want to rock the boat BUT he dosen't want to get screwed either. |
| Originally Posted by John J How long does a person have to file an appeal. This particular department will be hiring three more in the next year. Poor old #4 does not want to rock the boat BUT he dosen't want to get screwed either. |
| Originally Posted by emerlad Side note: "rocking out with your glock out" Interesting...... Didn't the alleged murder engineer guy have that plastered all over his my space page... Nothing like associating yourself with that..... |
| Originally Posted by emerlad Side note: "rocking out with your glock out" Interesting...... Didn't the alleged murder engineer guy have that plastered all over his my space page... Nothing like associating yourself with that..... |
| Originally Posted by Delta784 Yes.....just because a mentally unstable engineer murdered his wife, those mere words will now cause otherwise sane individuals to go on completely random murder sprees. |
| Originally Posted by emerlad By the way, your darn right, you most definitely had to give me that explanation. Stiffy. |
| Originally Posted by soxrock75 Are 1-4 on active duty or about to be deployed? Perhaps they withdrew because they might be getting sent overseas soon? Just a thought...... |
| Originally Posted by Boston24 This is true as this was the reason I had to defer in my process. But the Det. said that when another class comes out, those that deferred, like myself, would receive another card and pick up where the process left off dealing with the background invest. I also heard that there is a class that's going in Nov. and another next June. They are suppose to be sending cards for the Nov. class during the summer. |
| Originally Posted by mikeyv7712 Did the Det. tell you about the fall class? I keep hearing there is one too |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser
ma police, boston ma police, massachusetts police, massachusetts police, mass state police, mass police, ma, mass, massachusetts, massachusetts, massachutes, massachusetts law, massachusetts polece, police, officer, police officer, cops, police gear, law enforcement, police duty gear, state police, sheriff, law, police supply, police agency directory, police agency, police department, traffic officer, police dept, state trooper, dispatcher, massachusetts county sheriff, massachusetts sheriff, massachusetts department of corrections, ma doc, doc, dept of corrections, police information, civil service, ma civil service, massachusetts crime, police training, police academy, ma police academy, massachusetts officers, masscop, masscops, mpa, bpa, ibpoa, police association, massachusetts police news, massachusetts crime news, mass most wanted, police career information, police patrol, police administration, police books, crime scene training, police discussion, crime discussions, cops