By STEVE LeBLANC
Associated Press writer
March 24, 2008 6:00 AM
BOSTON — Rep. Barney Frank is defending a bill he plans to file this week decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana, saying the federal law unfairly targets those using medical marijuana in California.
Frank, who filed a bill to decriminalize marijuana as a member of the Massachusetts Legislature in the 1970s, said the decision whether to make possession of the drug illegal should be left up to the states.
He also said the federal government shouldn't have a law on the books that is rarely enforced and that doesn't make sense to large portions of the public.
"Do you really think people should be prosecuted for smoking marijuana? I don't think most people agree with that. It's one area where the public is ahead of the elected officials," Frank said in an interview with The Associated Press. "It does not appear to me to be a law that society is serious about."
Frank said he was particularly troubled by federal law enforcement agencies targeting those using marijuana as a legal medical treatment under California law.
"I don't think smoking marijuana should be a federal case," he said. "There's no federal law against mugging."
Marijuana use is illegal under U.S. law, which does not recognize the medical marijuana laws in California and 11 other states.
The Drug Enforcement Agency and other U.S. agencies have been shutting down major medical marijuana dispensaries throughout California in the past two years and charging their operators with felony distribution charges.
Frank first announced the bill on the HBO show "Real Time," hosted by Bill Maher.
Frank's comments come as pro-marijuana activists are pushing a ballot question that would decriminalize possession of an ounce or less of marijuana in Massachusetts.
Instead of facing a criminal record, those caught with a small amount of marijuana for personal use would instead pay a civil fine of $100 — much like a traffic ticket.
Supporters say the measure would save the state millions of dollars in law enforcement costs and spare thousands of state residents from the burden of a criminal record.
Critics, including the head of the anti-drug education group DARE-Massachusetts, say they oppose decriminalizing any amount of marijuana because it could send a signal to children that smoking pot is no big deal.
They say that while not everyone who smokes pot will end up shooting heroin, almost no heroin addicts begin with the more dangerous drug.
Activists pushing the initiative point to more than two dozen nonbinding referendum questions placed on local ballots in Massachusetts in the past six years.
In each, a majority of voters supported the idea of decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana.
About a dozen states have already adopted similar laws.
Asked about the marijuana ballot initiative last December, Gov. Deval Patrick said he had to consult with his Public Safety Secretary Kevin Burke and Secretary of Health and Human Services Dr. JudyAnn Bigby before staking out a position.
"I think they are both skeptical," he said at the time.
The ballot question isn't the only effort under way to ease the state's drug laws.
A bill working its way through the Statehouse would also decriminalize possession of an ounce or less of the drug, but set a higher fine of $250.
first of all marijuana is a depressant, so you can compare it to being drunk. hmm yea lets let people drive impared and get into plenty more car accidents which will drive out any insurance companies that just came into the state. plus risk, and I'm willing to guarantee, more deaths per year. And lets let them walk away with a few less bucks in their pockets by giving them fines and we'll just take the chance of having vehicular manslaughter instead, that sounds like a fair solution to me...
Not only that, but a good portion of the teenage population already smokes, imagine how many will be smoking if its decriminalized. I love how kids say smoking marijuana isnt bad for you... but yet people cough when they breathe in smoke, yea your body does that to tell you its good for your health...
so lets make our youth even worse drivers, kill off an even higher percentage of them in car accidents, and lessen the ratio of actually healthy kids these days with the already growing problems of alcoholism, obesity, and all the diseases out there. That guy's probably a pothead himself... I dont know whats going on in california, but it sounds like hes blowin smoke up our asses saying that the police mainly target people who have marijuana for medical reasons.
"Supporters say the measure would save the state millions of dollars in law enforcement costs and spare thousands of state residents from the burden of a criminal record."
really? how do we save money? does it really cost millions of dollars for police to arrest people for illegal use/possession of marijuana each year? I'd like to know where these "costs" are that can be saved on the pd's end when someone is arrested. If theyre talking about OT in court, then it just sounds like another way for greedy politicians to get the money put into their pockets rather than the police. And even if there are costs, I think people would prefer to have these "costs" as opposed to having an up in deaths each year.
Posted by: OfficerObie59
Nice. The state petition I saw recently was being handed out by a couple stoners in front of my local Wal-Mart. It proposed decrim of less than one ounce. Funny, what are we supposed to keep mail scales in our cars like the dealers do to avoid locking a kid up w/ .98 oz? Screw that, I don't wanna ride that train to federal court. Hell, first offenders only get CWOF'd n e ways.
ma police, boston ma police, massachusetts police, massachusetts police, mass state police, mass police, ma, mass, massachusetts, massachusetts, massachutes, massachusetts law, massachusetts polece, police, officer, police officer, cops, police gear, law enforcement, police duty gear, state police, sheriff, law, police supply, police agency directory, police agency, police department, traffic officer, police dept, state trooper, dispatcher, massachusetts county sheriff, massachusetts sheriff, massachusetts department of corrections, ma doc, doc, dept of corrections, police information, civil service, ma civil service, massachusetts crime, police training, police academy, ma police academy, massachusetts officers, masscop, masscops, mpa, bpa, ibpoa, police association, massachusetts police news, massachusetts crime news, mass most wanted, police career information, police patrol, police administration, police books, crime scene training, police discussion, crime discussions, cops
About MassCops, the home for Massachusetts law enforcement.
The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network opened in 1998 and is now a part of the New England Police Network The site is a pro-police discussion forum intended for sworn police officers and civilian law enforcement officials as well as those interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement here in Massachusetts.
The goal of The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network is to provide an informal network of law enforcement officials here in Massachusetts for educational and informational purposes.
The forum covers many topics such as Police Related News Articles, Agency & Profession Discussions, Police Training as well as Law Enforcement Career Information.
The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network and The New England Police Network (NEPN) and it's network sites are privately owned websites/domains and are not affiliated with or endorsed by any government association or agency.
MassCops (masscops.com) and (masscop.com) are privately owned are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Massachusetts Coalition of Police (masscop.org)