MassCops - Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network, A Mass Police Web Portal

Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network

Massachusetts Police News, Information and Discussions on MassCops



Pages: 1

Main Page

Mass Needs to Expunge records not just seal them

(Click here to view the original thread on the MassCops Message Board)


Posted by: EightEightteen

In Mass if you get arrested for a crime that you did not commit, your arrest record cannot be cleared because the state only seals records and doesn't expunge them. During a background check police departments will see that you have a sealed record on file and assume you just got off on a technicality. The DA says that he wants to retain this information just incase you are in a gang and they want to find known associates by your arrest information. Anyone else think that these records should be tossed out?



Posted by: Gil

You come to a pro police site and ask this?

Quote:
During a background check police departments will see that you have a sealed record on file and assume you just got off on a technicality.
Because that's what usually happens.

Quote:
Anyone else think that these records should be tossed out?
No



Posted by: justanotherparatrooper

let me get my popcorn and beer......this is gonna be fun.





Posted by: mtc

I think you're lost hunny - if you were arrested, it's because you committed a crime.

Cambridge is that way...... no..... that way.... really!



Posted by: j809

I think there should be something where it can tossed completely. A Massasoit PD sergeant was wrongly charged and arraigned for something that another larger state agency screwed up on. Once it is at arraignment it is on the BOP, forever. The case was immediately tossed and charges were dismissed. Yet he has a BOP now which cannot be expunged. He shouldn't have to explain himself when he applies for a job, an LTC or gets stopped for a MV violation and officer sees a gun charge on his BOP. Yes the system in MA sucks and needs to be addressed.



Posted by: 94c

Quote:
Originally Posted by EightEightteen View Post
In Mass if you get arrested for a crime that you did not commit, your arrest record cannot be cleared because the state only seals records and doesn't expunge them. During a background check police departments will see that you have a sealed record on file and assume you just got off on a technicality. The DA says that he wants to retain this information just incase you are in a gang and they want to find known associates by your arrest information. Anyone else think that these records should be tossed out?
First off, I'm gonna go mix my meds with Scotch.

Be right back...

Quote:
Originally Posted by j809 View Post
I think there should be something where it can tossed completely. A Massasoit PD sergeant was wrongly charged and arraigned for something that another larger state agency screwed up on. Once it is at arraignment it is on the BOP, forever. The case was immediately tossed and charges were dismissed. Yet he has a BOP now which cannot be expunged. He shouldn't have to explain himself when he applies for a job, an LTC or gets stopped for a MV violation and officer sees a gun charge on his BOP. Yes the system in MA sucks and needs to be addressed.
Chapter 6: Section 175. Inspection of record information by individual concerned; corrections; procedure; restrictions


Section 175. Each individual shall have the right to inspect, and if practicable, copy, criminal offender record information which refers to him. If an individual believes such information to be inaccurate or incomplete, he shall request the agency having custody or control of the records to purge, modify or supplement them. If the agency declines to so act, or if the individual believes the agency’s decision to be otherwise unsatisfactory, the individual may in writing request review by the board. The board shall in each case in which it finds prima facie basis for complaint, conduct a hearing at which the individual may appear with counsel, present evidence, and examine and cross-examine witnesses. Written findings shall be issued within sixty days of receipt by the board of the request for review. Failure to issue findings shall be deemed a decision of the board. If the record in question is found to be inaccurate, incomplete or misleading, the board shall order that the record be appropriately purged, modified, or supplemented by explanatory notation.



Posted by: j809

Yes but he and his attorney already called CHSB and courts, it can NEVER be expunged completely.



Posted by: justanotherparatrooper

Quote:
Originally Posted by j809 View Post
Yes but he and his attorney already called CHSB and courts, it can NEVER be expunged completely.
There is ALWAYs going to be a record of arrest, may not be "fair" but thats life. He will just have to explain it to the BI....



Posted by: Q5-TPR

Quote:
Originally Posted by justanotherparatrooper View Post
let me get my popcorn and beer......this is gonna be fun
I know it is in violation of Gen Order #1, but para, please pass me a cold one!



Posted by: Gil

Quote:
Originally Posted by Q5-TPR View Post
I know it is in violation of Gen Order #1, but para, please pass me a cold one!
Ah shit I can't drink when I come to visit?



Posted by: justanotherparatrooper

Quote:
Originally Posted by Q5-TPR View Post
I know it is in violation of Gen Order #1, but para, please pass me a cold one!




Posted by: Delta784

Has it been a full moon the last couple of days?



Posted by: Q5-TPR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gil View Post
Ah shit I can't drink when I come to visit?
Ahh, Gil my friend, you make me smile. The long answer is.....NO FUCKING WAY! They will grab you by the cahones and rip em off! On a brighter note, they came down with the word that the 772 is looking for volunteers if anyone is looking to do a quick turn around. And I said, are you out of u mind????? Not many takers to go with ya there kid! Sorry



Posted by: USMCTrooper

I'm not a fan of expunging a record esp since most of us here know the arrest is valid, however, 6 years ago I was told a story by a Superior Court prosecutor about a guy who was clearly, plain and simple, wrongly charged with murder. The "witness" who ID'd him was actually one of the accomplices to the killing. The brilliant detectives found the "witnesses" bag near the scene. He said he was a witness and they believed it. The guy wrongly accused wouldnt give an alibi because at the time of the killing, he was a passenger in a vehicle involved in a hit and run in another city but was afraid if he told the truth his uncle, the driver, would get in trouble. He was indicted and arraigned and headed for trial before the truth came out. It was an embarrassment for the DA's office and ultimately confirmed by the PD investigating the crash. His record still shows the charge, 6 years later. Shame on him for lying but WTF..........like I said I'm no liberal but in this case thats just plain F*CKED UP



Posted by: Tuna

Quote:
Originally Posted by j809 View Post
I think there should be something where it can tossed completely. A Massasoit PD sergeant was wrongly charged and arraigned for something that another larger state agency screwed up on. Once it is at arraignment it is on the BOP, forever. The case was immediately tossed and charges were dismissed. Yet he has a BOP now which cannot be expunged. He shouldn't have to explain himself when he applies for a job, an LTC or gets stopped for a MV violation and officer sees a gun charge on his BOP. Yes the system in MA sucks and needs to be addressed.
What's the issue with explaining it, if it was a mistake so be it. A large amount of arrests come from having "heads up" on the nitwit your dealing with. The BOP is a great tool to have at your disposal



Posted by: EightEightteen

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gil View Post
You come to a pro police site and ask this?



Because that's what usually happens.



No
Your response is a typical one, i would most likely respond the same way. But if you are in law enforcement, you know for a fact that sometimes innocent people are arrested, there are mistakes or false accusations. It may be uncommon, but it happens. Why should someone else have to suffer because of a mistake or because someone had a grudge against them?



Posted by: EightEightteen

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtc View Post
I think you're lost hunny - if you were arrested, it's because you committed a crime.

Cambridge is that way...... no..... that way.... really!
Not exactly sweetcheeks. My little brother is just starting apply to some departments and thats exactly the problem that he is facing. Now I know my opinion is biased as im related to him, but you have to admit that there are situations were people are arrested and are innocent. Maybe you're familiar with "Innocent until proven guilty"? Ive seen far to many applicants blackballed because of dismissals and in certain cases there should be a way to prevent that from happening.

Quote:
Originally Posted by USMCTrooper View Post
I'm not a fan of expunging a record esp since most of us here know the arrest is valid.....


.....however, 6 years ago I was told a story by a Superior Court prosecutor about a guy who was clearly, plain and simple, wrongly charged with murder.
It looks like your first statement contradicts your second one. I dont know how we would know that every arrest made is valid.



Posted by: BartA1

818,

if it was a mistake and your brother is truthful about what happened and everything else on his background is squeaky clean it shouldnt hold him back. Unless he was charged wth some despicable crime.



Posted by: mikemac64

There are cops, and we all know some, who have BOP's. If you got a disorderly down the cape when you were 17, or minor in possession, or something like that, you probably won't have a problem in most situations. It all depends on what the reports say. And even the most half assed BI will get those reports.

It depends not only on the crime, but the circumstances surrounding the crime, and also the disposition.

Now, if someone is exonerated, not a NG, but exonerated, I might not have an issue removing it. I apply this to someone who was truly framed/mis ID'd/etc (anyone remember Kenny Connoly)? But I think those cases are truly few and far between, especially since a NG does not necessarily mean innocent.



Posted by: Crvtte65

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gil View Post
Because that's what usually happens.

hahah i thought the same exact thing. Kinda like when people come and complain about the tickets... "you know that sometimes the cop gets it wrong, it was the other car".... noooo sorry I am not aware of that problem



Posted by: EightEightteen

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crvtte65 View Post
hahah i thought the same exact thing. Kinda like when people come and complain about the tickets... "you know that sometimes the cop gets it wrong, it was the other car".... noooo sorry I am not aware of that problem
The problem is that he said that's "usually" the case, meaning not always. It's just too bad that there's not a way to fix and obviously innocents persons record. Ive sat on too many oral boards to not know how a dismissal on a record is always a negative, regardless of the excuse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikemac64 View Post
There are cops, and we all know some, who have BOP's. If you got a disorderly down the cape when you were 17, or minor in possession, or something like that, you probably won't have a problem in most situations. It all depends on what the reports say. And even the most half assed BI will get those reports.

It depends not only on the crime, but the circumstances surrounding the crime, and also the disposition.

Now, if someone is exonerated, not a NG, but exonerated, I might not have an issue removing it. I apply this to someone who was truly framed/mis ID'd/etc (anyone remember Kenny Connoly)? But I think those cases are truly few and far between, especially since a NG does not necessarily mean innocent.
I know that it shouldn't be a big deal in the long run, but for some people it could be the straw that broke the camels back. The problem with NG not necessarily meaning innocent is that our system is based on being innocent until proven guilty. Now I know that most of the time a valid arrest means that the person is guilty, but to not allow any expungements just leaves the few innocent people twisting in the wind.



Posted by: mikemac64

Quote:
Originally Posted by EightEightteen View Post
The problem with NG not necessarily meaning innocent is that our system is based on being innocent until proven guilty
Kid, you got some love from some of us here. I am a cop in a medium sized city, and there was a Trooper who gave you some too as well as some others.

Put it all out there and let us see what a model citizen your brother is. What was he charged with? What was the disposition? What else is on his record? Were there victims? Otherwise this is an abstract academic conversation.



Posted by: EightEightteen

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikemac64 View Post
Kid, you got some love from some of us here. I am a cop in a medium sized city, and there was a Trooper who gave you some too as well as some others.

Put it all out there and let us see what a model citizen your brother is. What was he charged with? What was the disposition? What else is on his record? Were there victims? Otherwise this is an abstract academic conversation.
I started out in NH for few years and have been on a decent sized Mass force for almost 9, so im familiar with how the system works. That being said I was more interested in hearing peoples' thoughts on the issue. Ive noticed a lot of "the cop is always right" attitude in a couple posts and I understand that. I was just wondering if anyone saw it from the otherside.



Posted by: mtc

"Sweetcheeks" !!

The last guy that called me that is still gumming his McFries!

Fess up pup! What'd your brother do? For real, like his whole in-court career?



Posted by: EightEightteen

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtc View Post
"

Fess up pup! What'd your brother do? For real, like his whole in-court career?
His ex is a little off-balanced to say the least and had him arrested for domestic. The charges were dropped at arraignment. Maybe I'm wrong and he really did smack her around, but I doubt it.



Posted by: j809

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuna View Post
What's the issue with explaining it, if it was a mistake so be it. A large amount of arrests come from having "heads up" on the nitwit your dealing with. The BOP is a great tool to have at your disposal
He should NOT have to explain himself as he is innocent and the MSP LT F*CKED UP SO BAD that they even admitted, they found the missing gun on a night shift officer which no one bothered to do an inventory on, yet this poor sgt was charged with larceny of a firearm. After arraignment it's there forever, even though it's dismissed and even got a 'sorry,we fucked up letter". Why should he explain himself? How would you like to explain yourself to an officer during a stop that the murder charge on your BOP is bogus. Yeah, I would tell you to go pound sand too. They system is scrwed up and it does need some changes for these type of cases.



Posted by: sgtsmithers

Quote:
Originally Posted by EightEightteen View Post
His ex is a little off-balanced to say the least and had him arrested for domestic. The charges were dropped at arraignment. Maybe I'm wrong and he really did smack her around, but I doubt it.

I'll guess the charges were dropped because the victim didn't show up or wouldn't testify. "not guilty" doesn't always mean "innocent". Was bro arrested because the responding officer found bruises and a boot print on her cheek? etc.



Posted by: 94c

Quote:
Originally Posted by EightEightteen View Post
Ive sat on too many oral boards to not know how a dismissal on a record is always a negative, regardless of the excuse.
I call Bullshit....

You want a record to be expunged because a person is innocent but yet you see that same record as a negative?

That police report is going to surface no matter what the BOP says. He'll still have to explain it BOP or NOT.

Someone like you who has sat on too many oral boards would be expected to know that. No?





ma police, boston ma police, massachusetts police, massachusetts police, mass state police, mass police, ma, mass, massachusetts, massachusetts, massachutes, massachusetts law, massachusetts polece, police, officer, police officer, cops, police gear, law enforcement, police duty gear, state police, sheriff, law, police supply, police agency directory, police agency, police department, traffic officer, police dept, state trooper, dispatcher, massachusetts county sheriff, massachusetts sheriff, massachusetts department of corrections, ma doc, doc, dept of corrections, police information, civil service, ma civil service, massachusetts crime, police training, police academy, ma police academy, massachusetts officers, masscop, masscops, mpa, bpa, ibpoa, police association, massachusetts police news, massachusetts crime news, mass most wanted, police career information, police patrol, police administration, police books, crime scene training, police discussion, crime discussions, cops

About MassCops, the home for Massachusetts law enforcement.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network opened in 1998 and is now a part of the New England Police Network The site is a pro-police discussion forum intended for sworn police officers and civilian law enforcement officials as well as those interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement here in Massachusetts.

The goal of The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network is to provide an informal network of law enforcement officials here in Massachusetts for educational and informational purposes.

The forum covers many topics such as Police Related News Articles, Agency & Profession Discussions, Police Training as well as Law Enforcement Career Information.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network and The New England Police Network (NEPN) and it's network sites are privately owned websites/domains and are not affiliated with or endorsed by any government association or agency.

MassCops (masscops.com) and (masscop.com) are privately owned are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Massachusetts Coalition of Police (masscop.org)



vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser

3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 49 50 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108