
| I voted yes, but I don't think it would be popular after the first few; there isn't much drama in lethal injection. Put someone into Old Sparky and fire it up, the ratings would skyrocket. |
| Personally, I don't think executions should be televised. I honestly don't see a point for that. I read a book called "The Complete History of the Death Penalty" and they talked about the hangings as a way to scare people into not committing crimes. All it turned in to was an all day party-type event. So, if they are televising executions for THAT reason, I don't think it will work this time around....haha |
| Not only is executions for the serious crimes but I still feel that if you execute one i still believe that it would deter people from committing that act! Now back in the day where they used to use hanging and mutual dismembering as executions im sure they got alot more effect! haha but there is stats that back up public executions as a way to deter crime!which maybe is what we need around here! |
| I think speedy executions (rather than public) would be a much more effective deterrent. Look at the case of Giuseppe Zangara, who attempted to assassinate President Franklin Roosevelt and killed Chicago Mayor Anton Cermak instead. He was executed within a month of the murder, and after only 10 days (not years) on Florida's death row. THAT is justice. |
| Not only is executions for the serious crimes but I still feel that if you execute one i still believe that it would deter people from committing that act! Now back in the day where they used to use hanging and mutual dismembering as executions im sure they got alot more effect! haha but there is stats that back up public executions as a way to deter crime!which maybe is what we need around here! ![]() |
| If I was THAT upset and THAT full of rage at someone that all I could think about was murder, I don't think I would stop and think about how if I get caught there is a good chance I will be put to death. I would probably come up with a plan that, to me, would be the perfect crime. My mind would be consumed with anger and revenge. Then again, I'm not a murderer, so maybe they do stop and think before they pull the trigger. ![]() |
| so are you telling us that your a psycho? like you said your not a murder but what is stoping you? ![]() |
| HAHA! No no. I'm not a psycho. I was just trying to put myself into one's head. And you are right, there are many factors that play into this topic. Why people decide to take another humans life is beyond me... along with what they are thinking at the time. Anyways, back to the topic of putting executions on TV, I don't care either way. I would probably watch them as well. I just don't see a point. But then again, there are plenty of pointless things on tv as it is! |
| The main problem I see with our capital punishment is that we are trying to make a civilized process out of an uncivilized act. Executions should be brutal, reflective of the crime, and possibly made public to a certain degree. It would be great if we put inmates in a cage fight to the death and charge admission, and put the money towards [insert any better expenditure here]. |
| The main problem I see with our capital punishment is that we are trying to make a civilized process out of an uncivilized act. Executions should be brutal, reflective of the crime, and possibly made public to a certain degree. It would be great if we put inmates in a cage fight to the death and charge admission, and put the money towards [insert any better expenditure here]. |
| The main problem I see with our capital punishment is that we are trying to make a civilized process out of an uncivilized act. Executions should be brutal, reflective of the crime, and possibly made public to a certain degree. It would be great if we put inmates in a cage fight to the death and charge admission, and put the money towards [insert any better expenditure here]. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser