| why are they talking about changing the process or are there any rumors for a change? |
| As stated previously on the thread, the best two ways to get a LE job in Mass is veteran status and political influence. While I agree it's entirely fair to give Vets preference on any governmental hiring, how can one say that political influence to get a job (especially one as sensitive as police work) is okay and shouldn't be changed? |
| Many states down South use a modified CS system, where anyone can pay their own way to police academy, all LEOs are certified the same, and then once you've done that, you can fight it out with getting jobs. Mass makes it overly restrictive by limiting your choices, making the training inaccessible, and no standardization across Law Enforcement certification levels (part time, full time, corrections, police, etc...) |
| Not to say the way one state or another does something is perfect, but Mass is the most imperfect system I've seen so far. |
| And, if you're going to say that writing a big check to the campaign fund of a southern sheriff doesn't dramatically improve your chances of being hired, then you're either kidding yourself or are just full of shit. |
| The difference being, that down south (or out west), you may not need political pull to get hired. The departments are much bigger, the departments have money, and candidates are needed. The majority of departments here statewide only hire one, two, or a few a year (if that), with the exception of the bigger departments. This increases the need to call in political favors to get a foot in the door. |
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser