Does anyone happen to know the chapter and section of where it talks about Trustees having the power to swear in a officer? | CHAPTER 73. STATE COLLEGES AND COMMUNITY COLLEGES Chapter 73: Section 18. Control, movement and parking of motor vehicles Section 18. The trustees may appoint as police officers persons in the employ of such college who in the enforcement of said rules and regulations and throughout the property of such college shall have the powers of police officers, except as to service of civil process. Chapter 15A: Section 22. Board of trustees of community or state colleges; powers and duties Section 22. Each board of trustees of a community college or state college shall be responsible for Said rules and regulations shall be enforced by persons in the employ of the institution who throughout the property of the institution shall have the powers of police officers, except as to the service of civil process. . |
| That's the boiled down version that shows two (x2) laws that make state and community college police. Add in the new Ch90 language and thats it! |
| So then why do the State and CC's bother with SSPO? Seems to me they could fly on their own as police departments, right? ![]() |
| no one doubts that a college administrator swears you in to enforce laws and school regulations on the college campus. you are a campus police officer... no one disputes that ..no need to ferret out info about it ![]() |
| What bug crawled in your shorts? State and Community college cops enforce MGL's etc... not private institution "school regulations" And the question was a technical one, asking specific statute regarding above. Seems it fostered some good discussion. You don't need to to read these threads if they bother you in some way. ![]() |
| I know it's a bit off topic but I'm just looking to head off the possibilty of another age old debate, State -vs- Private college PD's. In my opinion it's a pointless argument because you can't paint either with a broad brush. |
| 1. You just contributed to the debate 2. As pointed out by dsm290, this started out as a technical question, and in FACT, the statutory authority for State Vs. Private schools makes it quite easy to differentiate between the two. Either as "broad brush" or in a narrow context focus. It's persons like yourself, in your rush to make ambiguous and supposedly concilatory statements, that turn the waters more translucent and convoluted. Then we get the inevitable bug who misinterprets something, gets defensive, and feels the need to throw some peripheral spice into the soup. Now we're all getting frustrated or scratching our heads and suddenly it's the State guys vs. the private guys BS that you were trying to "head off" in the first place. My goodness, The guy just asked for the statute(s) concerning Trustees appointing police officers. You and Loyal are trying to turn it into something argumentative. On the other hand, What the hell do I know about any of this garbage? ![]() |
| I think he tried to get into the State College system and he couldn't so now he has a grudge!!!!! |
| I swear, saying "the sky is blue" could cause a debate here sometimes. "Not when it's cloudy." "What about at night?" "At night it's actually two toned due to the stars." "Is the sky really blue or do we simply perceive it that way?" "YOU'RE WRONG!" etc. etc. etc. |
| I swear, saying "the sky is blue" could cause a debate here sometimes. "Not when it's cloudy." "What about at night?" "At night it's actually two toned due to the stars." "Is the sky really blue or do we simply perceive it that way?" "YOU'RE WRONG!" etc. etc. etc. |
94C, I won't argue with you! Now, if only I could have a few beers and maybe have a second opinion. LMAO
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser