Date: 10/19/2005
Case Style: Vanessa Dixon v. International Brotherhood of Police Officers, et al.
Case Number: 01-11806-WGY
Judge: William G. Young
Court: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Suffolk County
Plaintiff's Attorney: Inga S. Bernstein of Zalkind, Rodriguez, Lunt & Duncan LLP, Boston, Massachusetts
Defendant's Attorney: Joseph W. Monahan III of Law Offices of Monahan & Padellaro, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Description:
Plaintiff was sexually harassed by fellow police officers on a union sponsored trip and, following Police Department Investigation of that harassment and discipline of male officers, Union engaged in campaign of retaliatory harassment against plaintiff. Plaintiff’s contentions and causes of action: Discrimination, Retaliation, Defamation, Assault, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. General denial.
Outcome: Plaintiff's verdict for $2.2 million against the Union plus $1 against Flynn and in favor of Leary and Pender. $2,500 Discrimination: compensatory damages against IBPO, Local 382 and Flynn
$25,000 Discrimination: punitive damages against IBPO, Local 382
$1 Discrimination: punitive damages against Gerald Flynn
$1,200,000 Retaliation: compensatory damages against IBPO and John Leary
$1,000,000 Retaliation: punitive damages against IBPO
$2,500 Retaliation: punitive damages against John Leary $2,500 Intentional infliction of emotional distress against John Leary: $ 2,500
Plaintiff's Experts: Unknown
Defendant's Experts: Unknown
Comments: Editor's Note: As is often the case, the reaction on the part of an employer or organization to a complaint produces more harm and is easier to prove than the incident that gave rise to the complaint.