MassCops - Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network, A Mass Police Web Portal

Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network

Massachusetts Police News, Information and Discussions on MassCops



Pages: 1

Main Page

NEMLEC Sheriffs

(Click here to view the original thread on the MassCops Message Board)


Posted by: j809

I heard that Middlesex County Sheriff is or becoming a new member of NEMLEC and other Sheriff Departments are to follow. This was probably due to SPAM stepping on municipal Chiefs and Secretary of Public Safety shoes. BEcause the SDs have alot of resources such as command centers and other items they will be utilized alot. Seems like Regionalising is still going forward very strong. Like I said before, SPAM should chose its enemies wisely and not just piss on and attack these local departments's Chiefs.



Posted by: pmit81

i can't see why they would join since the muni's just booted everyone from the academy



Posted by: j809

They can still attend Lowell and MBTA academy as well as other NON MPTC academies.



Posted by: Wolfman


Another breed of wannabee.



Posted by: Dane

Beware of Greeks bearing gifts.



Posted by: John J

Quote:
Originally Posted by j809";p=&quot View Post
They can still attend Lowell and MBTA academy as well as other NON MPTC academies.
What other NON MPTC academies are out there?



Posted by: Jasper

relatively new here, but why would any Sheriffs Dept be involved in non jail related incidents ??!!?? they are simply not trained to be, or hired to be police in Massachusetts. Whole different ball game. They do jails - police do 9-1-1 - No disrespect intended - many police, including me, worked in county jails or state prisons prior to becoming police officers. Many of these Deputies have little or no real experience working in correctional facilities on a full time basis - let alone functioning in an uncontrolled environment where you don't know whats coming at you next, as police officers experience every day. The SPAM vs LEC ire that some people care about could easily be remedied by including State Police from each county into regional municipal police tactical response teams - better that than have LECs allow deputies on board. Keep it non political - municipal and state police together - sharing resources and the knowledge that only those that do 9-1-1 regularly have. State Police have resources just like some sheriffs departments - the difference is that the State Police should focus more on county by county services and resources before the sheriff departments beat them to the punch and make the S P obsolete - In many cities and towns the sheriffs dept is called for a k9 because the SP does not focus enough on regionalization and seldom has one nearby, etc, etc - County Sheriff Departments are expanding direct services to municipalities. The municipal police have every right, for their safety and that of the public to form LECs. The local police do 99% of 9-1-1 calls in this state . Why should they wait for a state police stop team to be contacted and arrive when a few officers from nearby towns can rapidly respond and assist on a mutual aid basis ??!!?? The State Police are not "needed" by many eastern Massachusetts police departments. Don't get me wrong - i respect them - but they need to realize that the Sheriff Departments are their up and coming competition. Local police call who ever has what resource that they need and can provide the quickest. Ideally, that would be the State police, but they seem to be falling behind and becoming irrelevant in local policing.



Posted by: bbelichick

Jasper,

the MSP doesn't have the bodies right now, not because they aren't "regionalized" but because of funding. The LEC's have been feeding on the Federal money. While the MSP is entitled to 20% of the grants, somehow (figure it out) approximately 10 or 11 million dollars that they were supposed to get never made it to them. They got $2 million or so out of 13 million they were entitled to. That is being looked into.

The MSP K-9's are broken up into Western, Central and East. There are 2 new RTT's, wilth around 150 trainees each. Within the year, the personnel problem should subside. If they get the grant money they are due, then they can start with more K-9 etc... and build services back up. They have gone 3 years without an RTT and that is why they are so shorthanded. Guys are retiring at a steady clip and not being replaced.



Posted by: yutyut1

Once again these LECS will go away eventually. The State Police have been around since the late 1800's I believe.

The grants and funding will soon dry up and we wont be chatting about this anymore. It may not be in a month, a year or more but it will end.....



Posted by: k9sheriff

Jasper, your right on one hand that there are Deputies in some counties that have no experience or the right training to be out working on the streets or responding to 911 calls.I don't know where you worked before, but it sonds like it wasn't run very efficiently.Anyway, how many full time police officers do you think each year are sworn in by the local sheriff's as Deputies?I could name quite a few.Do you think there is a reason for that?Some police think that the powers should be taken away but on the other hand others are first in line to be sworn in!You think the MSP is going to swear in every police officer as a special trooper so then can have county wide powers?I,ve been on 911 calls where it was totally appauliong watching the officers react to the situation at hand and you would never know they had any type of training.And if you mention taking a test again, tell me how many non-civil service towns there are where there are no tests ever for hirings or promotion.



Posted by: jo

K9 Sheriff.

You are right in your post. I was told by a local pd sgt that he approached the MSP and requested to have task force officers sworn in as special state police. He was denied. The county sheriff agreed to swear everyone in without any problems. This is only one example of how limiting sheriffs powers will effect local policing.



Posted by: bbelichick

Quote:
Originally Posted by jo";p=&quot View Post
K9 Sheriff.

You are right in your post. I was told by a local pd sgt that he approached the MSP and requested to have task force officers sworn in as special state police. He was denied. The county sheriff agreed to swear everyone in without any problems. This is only one example of how limiting sheriffs powers will effect local policing.
And why do you think they were so quick to provide these "powers"? Because they are trying to endear themselves to the locals as they try to take their jobs. How long until a ballsy Sheriff calls up the Mayor of a town in a contract dispute and offers to provide no cost policing to that town? Don't act like it will never happen.



Posted by: jo

Are you saying that the sheriff should have denied the locals request?



Posted by: k9sheriff

The sheriff's empowering police with Deputy sheriff powers is by far no new phenomenon.It's been going on for decades.Why wouldn't the MSP swear in full time police officers as specials.Just curious?I can't see how it would impede or threaten their job security, unless i'm missing something.



Posted by: jo

Another thing I will add. No Mayor or selectboard will ever accept anything but their town police policing their towns. Why, ask any trooper who stops a selectmen. Do you think when a selectmen in western mass gets stopped by a RI trained police officer he gets a cite NO WAY. The Chief himself will not write a selectmen. I know most town Chiefs don't want their officers to even write towns people. If a Sheriff ( another state agency ) started patrolling the mayor/selectmen would lose control. Hell most selectmen are even sworn in as police officers out here and have never worked a day on the road. WELCOME TO SMALL TOWN POLICING.



Posted by: jo

K9 Sheriff

I do not know why they could not get sworn in as SSPO but it just was not going to happen..



Posted by: PBC FL Cop

SSPO powers do not make one a trooper, the powers are very specific in their authority, which is why SSPO powers do not afford local PO's much in the enhancement of their jurisdiction. Its doesn't offer full state wide jurisdiction as one might think.



Posted by: SOT

TOTAL and UTTER BS. In my "western mass town" the Chief doesn't do any form of enforcement at all. Our police ARE the MSP. They are doing a great job, couldn't care any less who you are and who you know.
As to selectmen being sworn police...name your town and name names ecause again I'm calling BS on that. I go to MMA meetings, know a lot of selectmen and a very small minority are police.
In the towns I can think of where the slectmen are sworn, it's because they need folks because no one will volunteer, where the department is part time (read: MSP actually do enforcement) or there was an existing relationship PRIOR to the person becoming a selectmen.

So name the towns and the people.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jo";p=&quot View Post
Another thing I will add. No Mayor or selectboard will ever accept anything but their town police policing their towns. Why, ask any trooper who stops a selectmen. Do you think when a selectmen in western mass gets stopped by a RI trained police officer he gets a cite NO WAY. The Chief himself will not write a selectmen. I know most town Chiefs don't want their officers to even write towns people. If a Sheriff ( another state agency ) started patrolling the mayor/selectmen would lose control. Hell most selectmen are even sworn in as police officers out here and have never worked a day on the road. WELCOME TO SMALL TOWN POLICING.




Posted by: dfc2502

SOT
I wont list the names on a public forum, but off the top of my head take a look at Hancock (admin only), Tyringham and Chester.



Posted by: jo

SOT

Maybe you did not understand me about the MSP part of my post. So lets clear that up first. The MSP in western mass does a great job of patrolling the small towns. They in many cases are the police for small towns. The MSP would not be intimidated when stopping a selectmen or any other person in the small town political game.

Now, selectmen in many cases are sworn in as police. No training but they have the id when they get stopped. Many even have their little MPA stickers. I know a selectmen in greenfield that has a wallet badge. It reads "greenfield police commissioner". When out of the area I'm sure that id would work well when stopped.

What I was getting at is nobody has to worry about the sheriffs office contracting to provide police services for a small town. The select-board can control their local police but would lose that control should they contract out. Pick up your local paper, every few months some select-board is trying to run out the local chief and appoint some puppet they can easily control.



Posted by: SOT

So far you have named one town, and not one name...so keep going where are the MANY times...and how is greenfield "western mass", it's east of 91....


Western MA...think west of 91...not EAST of 91.


And again I am saying that the towns that use the MSP for a police force or to augment their police force couldn't give a rats ass about "controling the cops"...because if they are using contract services already. They DO NOT have control over who the MSP would arrest. Following this out, if they contracted with the Sheriff's department, again they wouldn't have the ability to say "stop these people or don't stop these...and they again wouldn't be in the position of being "law enforcement" because they have a part time force that doesn't do "enforcement" or have wholly contracted the work out.

My town, we have 4 police officers (one of which is the chief) they do road detail, LTC/FID, and some emergecy call outs. They DO NOT do any real law enfocement, the MSP does. Town next to me, one of the selectmen is the CLEO, but not to beat tickets, but because they have no one to do the job and he has been doing the job forever, prior to being a selectmen.
I think in reality if he could just hang out and farm, that would suit him fine. Next town south...real police force, although small, no selectmen are police officers. Town nort east, large police force, selectmen and mayor have are not memebers of the force.
Town south east, medium sized town, real police force...no selecment "badges" around.









Quote:
Originally Posted by jo";p=&quot View Post
SOT

Maybe you did not understand me about the MSP part of my post. So lets clear that up first. The MSP in western mass does a great job of patrolling the small towns. They in many cases are the police for small towns. The MSP would not be intimidated when stopping a selectmen or any other person in the small town political game.

Now, selectmen in many cases are sworn in as police. No training but they have the id when they get stopped. Many even have their little MPA stickers. I know a selectmen in greenfield that has a wallet badge. It reads "greenfield police commissioner". When out of the area I'm sure that id would work well when stopped.

What I was getting at is nobody has to worry about the sheriffs office contracting to provide police services for a small town. The select-board can control their local police but would lose that control should they contract out. Pick up your local paper, every few months some select-board is trying to run out the local chief and appoint some puppet they can easily control.




Posted by: PBC FL Cop

SOT II

Do you have any info about the Granville PD??

Thanks



Posted by: thumper2168

You made our point for US!!! Why do you think the Sheriff will Deputize everyone POLITICS!!! He doesn't care if they are trained at a real academy or they watched cops for a half an hour.... The MSP runs numerous drug task forces where they are both SSPO's and covered by another agreement....
The Middlesex Sheriff gave us brand new ID's and badge with a jacket for a little round up that we had going on. I was dying laughing as I gave away the jacket to the best looking blonde I could find in the room and the ID mhhhhhhhhh........ Good oversight they were printing them as fast as you could say your name...



Posted by: thumper2168

J809 why do you talk like you are in the third person or something??



Posted by: Macop

JO if you think R/I trained cops dont give selectman tickets in Wmass you are wrong. I know I have done it before to them and thier dumb ass kids., lol.



Posted by: k9sheriff

Thumper2168, remember your not speaking for all County Sheriff Departments.That doesn't happen in my Department.Remember that the Middlesex Sheriff is a former Sergeant with the Medford police.I don't think he is a total idiot.If you know anything about the Middlesex sheriff's you would know that they are a very professional department with alot of integrity.



Posted by: jo

SOT

Look on a map. Greenfield IS IN western mass. 91 runs through Greenfield, not north, south, east or west of it. Western mass is west of 495 not 91.

The State Police are not contracted by any towns in the commonwealth. They patrol an area barracks by barracks. They are the police department for many small towns and they do a fine job. Let the MSP thing go.

If a small town has a small police department, great. Selectmen should stick to politics and appoint trained police officers. Even if those officers are only issuing LTC.

Select-boards should over see their police departments not run something they no little or nothing about.

Sheriffs will never be contracted by a town in the commonwealth because they would not be able to be controlled by small town politics.

I only named one example of a selectmen with a badge he does not need. I will not name names in a forum that is open to the public. If you have been on the job long enough you have to know by now that some of your smaller towns appoint people that are not trained and never have or will work a shift.



Posted by: mpd61

jo!

WTF!?!?!?!


Selectmen in some towns have police commisioner badges. They don't mean SQUAT!!!!!!!! Anybody remember the Pembroke selectman who tried to use his about three years back? (Hee Hee) They are like silly reserve deputy badges.

State Police only warrant SSPO's under verrrry specific sections of CH.22C for specific agencies, but you know that now, right?

Why the bloody hell would Municipal guys/girls need all this multi-jurisdictional crap for anyway? Between fresh pursuit, warrants, mutual aid, task-force agreements, etc I would think that's enough.

Bottom line is that it is sooooooooooooooooo much easier to get sworn as a deputy sheriff than practically anything else in this commonwealth........
So in the end, POLITICS is the answer, so what's the question?



BTW- as an Earth Science major I can state as fact that between 495 and Palmer (exit#8 Pike) is CENTRAL MASS. You know Worcester, etc? Don't be such a goober!!!!




Posted by: USMCTrooper

Quote:
Originally Posted by j809";p=&quot View Post
I heard that Middlesex County Sheriff is or becoming a new member of NEMLEC and other Sheriff Departments are to follow. This was probably due to SPAM stepping on municipal Chiefs and Secretary of Public Safety shoes. BEcause the SDs have alot of resources such as command centers and other items they will be utilized alot. Seems like Regionalising is still going forward very strong. Like I said before, SPAM should chose its enemies wisely and not just piss on and attack these local departments's Chiefs.

Gee, I heard, no, I mean READ that the sheriff didn't get an increase in his budget. Gee, I also heard, no I mean READ its because he has deficiencies observed at his jail, which he is paid to operate properly. Without extra money to spend and with problems to correct, where does he find the money to pay his annual Lec membership fee? It sounds as if he is not paying attention to his paid responsibilities of properly running a correctional facility. Maybe its time to do his job.
Gee, I wonder





ma police, boston ma police, massachusetts police, massachusetts police, mass state police, mass police, ma, mass, massachusetts, massachusetts, massachutes, massachusetts law, massachusetts polece, police, officer, police officer, cops, police gear, law enforcement, police duty gear, state police, sheriff, law, police supply, police agency directory, police agency, police department, traffic officer, police dept, state trooper, dispatcher, massachusetts county sheriff, massachusetts sheriff, massachusetts department of corrections, ma doc, doc, dept of corrections, police information, civil service, ma civil service, massachusetts crime, police training, police academy, ma police academy, massachusetts officers, masscop, masscops, mpa, bpa, ibpoa, police association, massachusetts police news, massachusetts crime news, mass most wanted, police career information, police patrol, police administration, police books, crime scene training, police discussion, crime discussions, cops

About MassCops, the home for Massachusetts law enforcement.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network opened in 1998 and is now a part of the New England Police Network The site is a pro-police discussion forum intended for sworn police officers and civilian law enforcement officials as well as those interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement here in Massachusetts.

The goal of The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network is to provide an informal network of law enforcement officials here in Massachusetts for educational and informational purposes.

The forum covers many topics such as Police Related News Articles, Agency & Profession Discussions, Police Training as well as Law Enforcement Career Information.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network and The New England Police Network (NEPN) and it's network sites are privately owned websites/domains and are not affiliated with or endorsed by any government association or agency.

MassCops (masscops.com) and (masscop.com) are privately owned are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Massachusetts Coalition of Police (masscop.org)



vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2009 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser

3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 49 50 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108