MassCops - Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network, A Mass Police Web Portal

Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network

Massachusetts Police News, Information and Discussions on MassCops



Pages: 1

Main Page

Worcester State College Police Armed!

(Click here to view the original thread on the MassCops Message Board)


Posted by: nightcopppa

Friday, November 9, 2007 WSC trustees OK armed police

9-1 vote counters student poll on guns

By Jacqueline Reis TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF
jreis@telegram.com
var helper = new DHTMLHelper();var model = helper.createModel();var photoString = new String("");model.makeHolder('extraPhotoHolder', true);


WORCESTER— The Worcester State College campus may have been divided on the issue on whether to arm campus police, but the college’s board of trustees wasn’t: It voted 9-1 last night to have the 16 officers carry side arms.

The sole dissenter was student representative Brandon Huggon, who supported the move personally but voted against it on the basis of a student poll in which 155 students voted against the change and 148 voted for it.

Board Chairman George W. Tetler III said the deciding factor was the recommendation of college President Janelle Ashley and “the expertise of the staff who are responsible” for campus safety.

Police Chief Rosemary F. Naughton said arming campus police will allow them to respond to calls in which someone might have a gun rather than waiting for Worcester or state police, who do not know the campus as well.

“My nightmare is… a critical incident when we’re fully trained and we can’t go in and stop the threat,” she said. “I can’t imagine nowadays not approving this proposal.”

The campus has 3,000 to 5,000 people on it on any given day, and crime happens, she said.

Ms. Ashley said, “Our world has changed, and I believe we must be proactive in preparing the safety of our campus community.”

The vote came after three forums, one each for the student government, students in general and the faculty. Thirty-five students, faculty, staff and alumni addressed the board. Sixteen spoke against the measure and 10 for it. Some, including philosophy professor Daniel C. Shartin, asked the board the table the issue so debate could continue.

Opponents did so for a variety of reasons, from changing the campus climate to a fear that guns could be used disproportionately against people of color.

“Guns and my people don’t get along well,” said Domingo Guyton, a Worcester State alumnus who is adviser to the student multicultural organization Third World Alliance.

“It is a complete change in our culture, and the board should think about that,” said Frank S. Minasian, chairman of the Department of History and Political Science.

“I don’t like guns. … I don’t even want to walk by an officer that’s carrying one,” said senior Obi Ajuonuma, who noted that campus police spend four hours on cultural diversity training and 12 hours preparing for the graduation ceremony, according to a handout the college distributed last night.

Resident assistants who spoke were in favor of arming police. Amber Boivin recalled one incident in which a man beat up three students off campus, then arrived on campus, and it took Worcester police a half hour to arrive. The man wasn’t found for another couple hours, she said.

Last night’s vote was contingent on the submission of a detailed side arm policy. Officers will not be armed until they finish firearm training, Chief Naughton said, and they must undergo an additional psychological assessment (beyond the one they had when they were hired). Most of the officers have been armed or are armed while working for other agencies, according to the college.

Other local schools with armed campus police include Assumption College, Becker College, Clark University and Worcester Polytechnic Institute.



Posted by: Nightstalker

Ahhhh geez!!!! Now I am going to have to transfer to another school... First haaavard, then Yale, Now Worcester State.... Thank Goodness for the Salters School or I wouldn't be able to get a safe education!


“Guns and my people don’t get along well,” said Domingo Guyton, - What the hell is that supposed to mean? lol



Posted by: mpd61

Congrats!
Finally a Board AND administration that allows common sense to prevail!




Posted by: Macop

It means the guy is a clown and has NOTHING intellegent to say.



Posted by: Killjoy

Quote:
“Guns and my people don’t get along well,” said Domingo Guyton, a Worcester State alumnus who is adviser to the student multicultural organization Third World Alliance.
Sure they do..as long as your the one wielding the gun. I notice his "title" is another one of those made of leftist propaganda moobat jobs.
Quote:
“I don’t like guns. … I don’t even want to walk by an officer that’s carrying one,” said senior Obi Ajuonuma, who noted that campus police spend four hours on cultural diversity training and 12 hours preparing for the graduation ceremony, according to a handout the college distributed last night.
Then move to some freakin country where the cops don't carry guns. I would bet in whatever country this clown's from the police pack a lot more heat than a pistol.



Posted by: GodblessThearmy

I could not imagine why these people feel it isn't necessary to arm their campus police... I can recall numerous times Harvard or MIT helped us out with calls. Not only do they provide excellent policing on campus but they also deter and help us with fighting crime off campus.



Posted by: sempergumby

one reason why Campus Police should carry...VIRGINIA TECH..............ohhh one other thing if you carry the honorable title POLICE you should also carry a gun..........



Posted by: rg1283

Now only if QCC and Holy Cross would get armed.



Posted by: Dan8784

Conrgrats for Worcester State it is about time! I dont see Quinsig or Holy Cross getting armed in near future unfortunately.


Quote:
Originally Posted by rg1283
Now only if QCC and Holy Cross would get armed.




Posted by: US706

Congrats...Now if they could get FSC armed up that would be great too...



Posted by: fscpd907

Quote:
Originally Posted by US706
Congrats...Now if they could get FSC armed up that would be great too...
The Framingham State College Facilities Planning Committee conducted a study on the matter and recommended to the President that FSCPD should be provided with firearms. This is the first positive step in a long ongoing process.



Posted by: nightcopppa

It's my opinion that the state seems to be heading towards arming all of their State run College Police Department's. Especially with language now regulating training requirements for departments receiving citation books. Framingham is the only one left out of the major State Schools without guns. I think it's just a matter of time before it happens. Keep up the good work, and keep your chins up FSCPD!



Posted by: mpd61

Quote:
Originally Posted by US706
Congrats...Now if they could get FSC armed up that would be great too...
I agree! Pam, Brian, Karen, and all my special friends over there deserve it!

BTW-One Framingham State Cop is worth Ten Fitchburg State AFSCME-Lovin fags



Posted by: US706

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpd61
I agree! Pam, Brian, Karen, and all my special friends over there deserve it!

BTW-One Framingham State Cop is worth Ten Fitchburg State fags
You just love to flame



Posted by: K.Lavoie

Congrats to all the officers who work there. I just hope that others follow!



Posted by: SinePari

An armed society is a polite society. Well done WSC.



Posted by: sgt128-13

Quote:
Originally Posted by rg1283
Now only if QCC and Holy Cross would get armed.
I heard through the rumor mill that Holy Cross would be making the pitch to arm their officers early next year. Congrats to WSC!!!



Posted by: sgtsmithers

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgt128-13
I heard through the rumor mill that Holy Cross would be making the pitch to arm their officers early next year. Congrats to WSC!!!

Never happen. The students at Holy Cross would be allowed to carry firearms before the 'Public Safety' Officers. All Use-of-Force policies must be approved by Jesus, personally. I believe HC's Dept has more Sgts and rank than they do Officers. Very top-heavy department. They may want to propose arming the rank first, then work their way into arming the Officers. Worked for Umass- Memorial.



Posted by: mikeyd1313

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtsmithers
Never happen. The students at Holy Cross would be allowed to carry firearms before the 'Public Safety' Officers. All Use-of-Force policies must be approved by Jesus, personally. I believe HC's Dept has more Sgts and rank than they do Officers. Very top-heavy department. They may want to propose arming the rank first, then work their way into arming the Officers. Worked for Umass- Memorial.
There is one big guy down there that shouldn't be armed at memorial, can't even see his gun belt.



Posted by: sgtsmithers

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyd1313
There is one big guy down there that shouldn't be armed at memorial, can't even see his gun belt.


I've counted two. They don't even need holsters, sidearm just stays in orbit around their guts/gunts. Both are good guys. And yes, you can carry sprinkle topped doughnuts in your 'cuff case.



Posted by: SSPO#11

Yes....congrats FSCPD....Hopefully all of you move on to greener pastures.

I agree with the HC comments. I am taking a vacation day and sitting in on that public forum when they pitch that idea. Are you sure it was firearms not batons?? When I worked there we had OC and CUFFS. My Sergeant wore just a radio....that's it. He kept his handcuffs in his jacket pocket! HAHAHHAH.



Posted by: mpd61

Seriously!

Somebody find out if and when the public forum will be held. Be nice if a few cops showed up to show support. Somebody PM or post it when you know please!




Posted by: Kilvinsky

Quote:
Originally Posted by nightcopppa
Friday, November 9, 2007 WSC trustees OK armed police

9-1 vote counters student poll on guns

By Jacqueline Reis TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF
jreis@telegram.com
var helper = new DHTMLHelper();var model = helper.createModel();var photoString = new String("");model.makeHolder('extraPhotoHolder', true);


WORCESTER— The Worcester State College campus may have been divided on the issue on whether to arm campus police, but the college’s board of trustees wasn’t: It voted 9-1 last night to have the 16 officers carry side arms.
About time. WSC, you've earned the right to keep yourself from getting killed and FINALLY someone in 'authority' realized it...even if it's not YOU they're worried about. It all comes out in the wash.

The sole dissenter was student representative Brandon Huggon, who supported the move personally but voted against it on the basis of a student poll in which 155 students voted against the change and 148 voted for it.
Sounds like a REAL politician. Give him a few years and he'll be running for the Congress!


Board Chairman George W. Tetler III said the deciding factor was the recommendation of college President Janelle Ashley and “the expertise of the staff who are responsible” for campus safety.
I like that last line in quotes. Not nearly enough college administrators take that simple yet obvious fact into consideration.

Police Chief Rosemary F. Naughton said arming campus police will allow them to respond to calls in which someone might have a gun rather than waiting for Worcester or state police, who do not know the campus as well.

“My nightmare is… a critical incident when we’re fully trained and we can’t go in and stop the threat,” she said. “I can’t imagine nowadays not approving this proposal.”
This chief uses the old "We arm or you die" tactic very nicely. I like her!


The vote came after three forums, one each for the student government, students in general and the faculty. Thirty-five students, faculty, staff and alumni addressed the board. Sixteen spoke against the measure and 10 for it. Some, including philosophy professor Daniel C. Shartin, asked the board the table the issue so debate could continue.
This only makes sense because all those faculty staff and students with far more police experience SHOULD weigh in on the issue.

Opponents did so for a variety of reasons, from changing the campus climate (and don't we have enough of THAT to worry about with Global Warming?) to a fear that guns could be used disproportionately against people of color.
Every armed college cop in this state has shot at least three people of color in the past year so I can fully understand that reasoning. I've faced off armed white guys but refused to shoot them because, well, hell, they were white. (this entire statement is irony and sarcasm, NOT to be taken seriously by ANYONE!-thank you)


“Guns and my people don’t get along well,” said Domingo Guyton, a Worcester State alumnus who is adviser to the student multicultural organization Third World Alliance.
Maybe if he got to actually KNOW the guns. Buy them a round or two, take them to a movie. Can't we all just get along?

“I don’t like guns. … I don’t even want to walk by an officer that’s carrying one,” said senior Obi Ajuonuma...
An intelligent statement if ever I read one. Heck, I don't blame him, those things go off if there's a stiff breeze and we all know that only psychos carry guns anyway; especially the ones in a uniform.

Resident assistants who spoke were in favor of arming police. Amber Boivin recalled one incident in which a man beat up three students off campus, then arrived on campus, and it took Worcester police a half hour to arrive. The man wasn’t found for another couple hours, she said.
I love this girl, but I think she made this up for effect. Those things don't really happen on a college campus. Ok, MAYBE Simon's Rock of Bard. No, wait, they only have that occassional student with a rifle shoot the security guards.

Last night’s vote was contingent on the submission of a detailed side arm policy. Officers will not be armed until they finish firearm training, Chief Naughton said, and they must undergo an additional psychological assessment (beyond the one they had when they were hired). Most of the officers have been armed or are armed while working for other agencies, according to the college.
Makes sense. If these people are going to arm the cops, the cops should show to the world that they are FULLY quallified and silence, or at least muffle the mis/ill informed. That was NOT sarcasm.

Other local schools with armed campus police include Assumption College, Becker College, Clark University and Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
</IMG>



Posted by: rg1283

Maybe QCC will be armed in the next 10 or 20 years. However, Holy Cross, I don't see it ever happening. The Virginia Tech Incident has woken up some people. I am still surprised about Brandeis.



Posted by: 5-0

Quote:
Maybe QCC will be armed in the next 10 or 20 years. However, Holy Cross, I don't see it ever happening. The Virginia Tech Incident has woken up some people.
It may have woken up some people, but people on College Hill are still sleeping. I was going to keep my mouth shut seeing this thread was about WSC, but a certain unarmed college in the Worcester area came up so... (HC cough cough)

QCC is 10 million times more likely to get armed than HC. If you look at where QCC was 10 years ago vs. HC, they have come light years. HC would (as someone mentioned) need written approval from Jesus Christ himself to arm anyone on the department. The officers don't even have ballistic vests/batons, let alone firearms. The problem is that colleges like HC are more concerned about their 45k (50 for a freshman now) students than they are about their officers. I am speaking about the faculty and administration, the chief has actually started to come around to fight for the officer's lately. It's not hard to understand that it's a game on campuses to essentially 'protect' the students from the municipal police. The campuses want police because if they were 'Security', they would have to rely on the municipals who would come in and trample their student body (which might not be a bad thing). If a school can have their own private police force that is castrated, it makes it easier to con the parents into thinking the campus is safe.

3 firearms related calls (On Campus) in the last 3 months. An ADW (knife) right outside the gate, and several shootings in the area? (Including the College Square Shell station Latin King related shooting--- 100 yards from the property) When I work a shift and look like a trooper (minus the campaign cover) without the tools to protect myself and the students, I wonder if I am mildly retarded sometimes.

Something really bad is going to happen to a student or an officer, because they have stripped us of our first level of command presence: Our damn PRESENCE! I can't tell you how many times I have seen a drunk turd eyeing my duty belt, or a little kid say: Hey a Police Officer! and the parent saying: 'No, thats just security'. Ivory Tower liberals don't realize that the perception of people is Guns=Police No Guns = Security. It's not our fault that people think that way.

I wish touchy feely administrators could understand that declawing your police actually has an inverse affect on the 'Community Policing' that they want to achieve. I use a dog analogy: What would you rather have protecting you? A poodle that is a viscious little prick, or a 95 lb German Shephard that is nice? The poodle HAS to act like a prick from the get-go because you immediately see it as a joke. I prefer the Shepherd because like a geared and squared officer, it's mere presence has an effect on the situation. The dog may be nice, but you are always wondering when it's going to bite your face off.

When I go to a call, my command presence is already impacted because of my gear, so I actually may put more verbal pressure on a student (which will impact my community policing) than I would if I was perceived as a 'real' police officer as soon as I came on scene. Essentially, we have to turn up the heat from the start to get the respect (or fear, it's all the same to me) that say a Worcester officer would get.

-Rant over.



Posted by: HELPMe

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5-0
It may have woken up some people, but people on College Hill are still sleeping. I was going to keep my mouth shut seeing this thread was about WSC, but a certain unarmed college in the Worcester area came up so... (HC cough cough)

QCC is 10 million times more likely to get armed than HC. If you look at where QCC was 10 years ago vs. HC, they have come light years. HC would (as someone mentioned) need written approval from Jesus Christ himself to arm anyone on the department. The officers don't even have ballistic vests/batons, let alone firearms. The problem is that colleges like HC are more concerned about their 45k (50 for a freshman now) students than they are about their officers. I am speaking about the faculty and administration, the chief has actually started to come around to fight for the officer's lately. It's not hard to understand that it's a game on campuses to essentially 'protect' the students from the municipal police. The campuses want police because if they were 'Security', they would have to rely on the municipals who would come in and trample their student body (which might not be a bad thing). If a school can have their own private police force that is castrated, it makes it easier to con the parents into thinking the campus is safe.

3 firearms related calls (On Campus) in the last 3 months. An ADW (knife) right outside the gate, and several shootings in the area? (Including the College Square Shell station Latin King related shooting--- 100 yards from the property) When I work a shift and look like a trooper (minus the campaign cover) without the tools to protect myself and the students, I wonder if I am mildly retarded sometimes.

Something really bad is going to happen to a student or an officer, because they have stripped us of our first level of command presence: Our damn PRESENCE! I can't tell you how many times I have seen a drunk turd eyeing my duty belt, or a little kid say: Hey a Police Officer! and the parent saying: 'No, thats just security'. Ivory Tower liberals don't realize that the perception of people is Guns=Police No Guns = Security. It's not our fault that people think that way.

I wish touchy feely administrators could understand that declawing your police actually has an inverse affect on the 'Community Policing' that they want to achieve. I use a dog analogy: What would you rather have protecting you? A poodle that is a viscious little prick, or a 95 lb German Shephard that is nice? The poodle HAS to act like a prick from the get-go because you immediately see it as a joke. I prefer the Shepherd because like a geared and squared officer, it's mere presence has an effect on the situation. The dog may be nice, but you are always wondering when it's going to bite your face off.

When I go to a call, my command presence is already impacted because of my gear, so I actually may put more verbal pressure on a student (which will impact my community policing) than I would if I was perceived as a 'real' police officer as soon as I came on scene. Essentially, we have to turn up the heat from the start to get the respect (or fear, it's all the same to me) that say a Worcester officer would get.

-Rant over.
Are you sure you dont work at the same fine institution as me?..lol..I think your rant pretty much sums up how all the officers feel at an unarmed college. I chuckled at the security rant. You know its bad when your "fellow" officers that work for the town sh!t on you and call you security. I have been called everything from Pig, rent a cop, 2.5 (because I guess I am not a really 5.0..lol) campus pig, security guard, security, etc. But never once been addressed as a police officer. The students see the old farts on the day shift and think we are all a joke. Community policing is a flaud model if you cannot get respect or help from the community that you work in. I could go on as well but just letting you know that you are not the only one.



Posted by: SinePari

Quote:
Originally Posted by HELPMe
I have been called everything from Pig, rent a cop, 2.5 (because I guess I am not a really 5.0..lol)
That's OK, most people don't know what the hell 5-0 means anyway . Stupid college kids!



Posted by: mpd61

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5-0
If a school can have their own private police force that is castrated, it makes it easier to con the parents into thinking the campus is safe.
Give the man a cookie!

When I work a shift and look like a trooper (minus the campaign cover) without the tools to protect myself and the students, I wonder if I am mildly retarded sometimes.
No you've got the guts to hang until something better comes along!

Ivory Tower liberals don't realize that the perception of people is Guns=Police No Guns = Security. It's not our fault that people think that way.
Amen brother!

The dog may be nice, but you are always wondering when it's going to bite your face off.
Insert cop in place of dog. You're absolutely right

Essentially, we have to turn up the heat from the start to get the respect (or fear, it's all the same to me) that say a Worcester officer would get.
Excellent point again!
-Rant over.
By george, I think he's got it!?!?!?



Posted by: 5-0

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinePari
That's OK, most people don't know what the hell 5-0 means anyway . Stupid college kids!
They think a rap star came up with it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Five-O



Posted by: Vader

Where do the college pd's go to get firearms certification?



Posted by: sgt128-13

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5-0
It may have woken up some people, but people on College Hill are still sleeping. I was going to keep my mouth shut seeing this thread was about WSC, but a certain unarmed college in the Worcester area came up so... (HC cough cough)
I only mentioned that I had knowledge that HC would be making their proposal to become armed... not that they'd get or need them. I'm not sure if QCC is making the same proposal, but if they don't ask, they're not just going to miracle them to the PD's.

It's not about which PD's deserve being armed first, it's about making the pitch to get them. With enough college department's getting armed in the past three years, it has a snowball effect. You just can't say you need them either, you have to show administrators... the non-cops, the particulars of why you need them and put it in an eloquent and factual proposal. That's what we did and after we became armed, our Chief gave a copy of that same proposal to WSC and to HC at their request.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vader
Where do the college pd's go to get firearms certification?
What do you mean by "certification"? Are you talking about training?



Posted by: Vader

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgt128-13
What do you mean by "certification"? Are you talking about training?
Yes. I'm sure there is a qualifying course or something that an officer would have to attend. Just wondering if that is done "in house" or what?



Posted by: sgtsmithers

Where do the college pd's go to get firearms certification?


Worcester State College and Umass Memorial are being /were trained and certified by City of Worc PD's firearms instructors. All Depts issue same firearm. Range and classroom, I believe total 24 hours.



Posted by: topcop14

When I worked at HC, over 10 years ago, I worked on a proposal with then Captain Carmody, to arm some of the campus police. I don't think the proposal ever made it out of the basement office. At that time they had just started issuing OC



Posted by: mpd61

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vader
Where do the college pd's go to get firearms certification?
That's kinda an open ended question with a broad range of answers.(get it)?

Most College P.D.'s have their own in-house program/policy/procedure. Massasoit used to have a certified armorer/instructor + three (3) other MPTC certified instructors. They also used to qualify four times a year with some tactical stuff and night shoot, not just paper punching. They also went to 40 hour in-service to qual, Now they don't seem to do much of anything except...naw, I'm not going there.

Anywayyyyy, As long as the department trains and qualifies to MPTC standards, they'll meet or exceed anything, including the SSPO CMR's




Posted by: sgt128-13

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vader
Yes. I'm sure there is a qualifying course or something that an officer would have to attend. Just wondering if that is done "in house" or what?
I suppose that the minimum standard of meeting the MPTC firearms qualification is the basic minimum. We send our officers to the one-week tactical pistol course at S&W. If they have little to no firearms familiarity, then we run a 3-day, in-house training session to prepare them for the TP course. After that, they fall in line with the quarterly qualifications. Again, all the MPTC mandates is just an annual qual.



Posted by: JMB1977

has there been any talk at QCC getting armed anytime in the furture?



Posted by: rg1283

Be thankful you don't work in RI. At RI College (a state school like framingham state), only supervisors carry.....
OC and a Baton... Everyone else carrys handcuffs and a radio.

Since you only need to be 18+ to carry OC in RI, the Providence Place Mall gaurds all carry it.

I think in MA their are more campus PDs then any other new england state. Some states have security gaurds who have powers to detain as their campus police, but for the most part its all Security Gaurd type stuff at most schools in other new england states it seems. Except for the flagship state universitys that usually have guns and police. Except for URI.



Posted by: Kilvinsky

Quote:
Originally Posted by rg1283
Be thankful you don't work in RI. At RI College (a state school like framingham state), only supervisors carry.....
OC and a Baton... Everyone else carrys handcuffs and a radio.

Since you only need to be 18+ to carry OC in RI, the Providence Place Mall gaurds all carry it.

I think in MA their are more campus PDs then any other new england state. Some states have security gaurds who have powers to detain as their campus police, but for the most part its all Security Gaurd type stuff at most schools in other new england states it seems. Except for the flagship state universitys that usually have guns and police. Except for URI.
Right on the money. I've visited a the Public Safety departments of a couple of schools and found they're quite professional, but with lack of police authority and limited equipment, they're kind of in a tough spot. I'm not totally sure about the private schools in CT, though at least two (Yale and Univ. of New Haven) have PD's.

A lot of folks complain about how backwards things are here, but truthfully, if you check out the rest of the Northeast, we're really at the forefront. Mass. is the only State that has a state law concerning private college and university and hospital police. New York takes schools on an individual basis and there's only four I know of with "Peace Officer" status. Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire only give the state schools, and NOT all of them, the authority to have a PD.

Mass. really IS far and away the best though at times it sure as hell doesn't seem like it.



Posted by: Dan8784

QCC will not be armed anywhere in the near future. There is too much opposition within the department not so much the college. I would not be surprised if it is the last state run college to get armed.



Posted by: mpd61

No...Mass Bay will be way behind QCC. Don't even think Cape Cod Community




Posted by: Kilvinsky

Does 4C even have a PD or is it contract? I believe that Berkshire USED to have an in-house PD (I've got a patch) but they disbanded them. When, I don't know.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan8784
QCC will not be armed anywhere in the near future. There is too much opposition within the department not so much the college. I would not be surprised if it is the last state run college to get armed.
Did you type WITHIN???? So, some of the people working there DON'T want firearms? That's VERY interesting.



Posted by: SinePari

It sounds like there needs to be a uniform policy regarding all state schools and private schools can make their own decisions.



Posted by: mpd61

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinePari
It sounds like there needs to be a uniform policy regarding all state schools and private schools can make their own decisions.
True my buddy.

The problem is there is so much autonomy at each state school(s) coupled with a lack of direction/policy/guidance from Board of Higher Ed (political subdivision) that you end up with such a disparity as to how the P.D.'s organize and operate.
State College= Bridgewater State v. Framingham State, both operate under the same Statutes, and have great academy training (MPOC & SSPO) yet Framingham State can't trust their officers with firearms.
Community College= Massasoit v. Bunker Hill, both in urban territory. Massasoit goes for SSPO waivers and does CMVI and carries guns. Bunker Hill had Academy trained folks and doesn't carry.

Now Bridgewater State and Mass bay have dropped SSPO, and therefore, any MSP Cert Unit influence. Massasoit is desperately trying to focus on the restrictive SSPO rules as a mechanism to terminate two cops suspended without just cause. This is because both Board of Higher Ed and Community College Offices of General Counsel (how redundant?) are advising the state schools to ignore
Statutes/Practices of the past four (4) decades to de-evolve and focus on CH22C/s.63 to castrate the P.D.'s

Am I starting to sound like a broken record or what?



Posted by: Dan8784

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpd61
No...Mass Bay will be way behind QCC. Don't even think Cape Cod Community
Trust me QCC is no where close to getting armed certain dinosaurs in to department dont like guns.
</IMG>



Posted by: SinePari

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan8784
Trust me QCC is no where close to getting armed certain dinosaurs in to department dont like guns.
</IMG>
West Boylston St has its share of criminal activity and anybody with uniform should armed. Every now and then I'll swing by QCC while on patrol and a lot of times I'll make an arrest for something I wasn't even looking for.



Posted by: screamineagle

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinePari
West Boylston St has its share of criminal activity and anybody with uniform should armed. Every now and then I'll swing by QCC while on patrol and a lot of times I'll make an arrest for something I wasn't even looking for.
amen to that. I work right off of west boylston street and we get a lot of shitbags coming on to our property.



Posted by: rg1283

Occasionally homeless people appear in the library at QCC while I am studying. Most seem harmless, but remembering the drunks and crackheads I see at the hospital who list their address as the PIP shelter, makes me wonder.



Posted by: fscpd907

Judge rejects effort to delay gun-toting WSC cops

Court challenge to side arms remains active

By Gary V. Murray TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF

WORCESTER— Four Worcester State College faculty members challenging the validity of a 9-1 trustees’ vote authorizing campus police officers to carry side arms have lost their bid for an injunction that would have temporarily blocked implementation of the new policy.

The faculty members alleged in a civil lawsuit that the Nov. 8 vote by the school’s board of trustees was in violation of the state’s Open Meeting Law. The plaintiffs in the case, faculty members Daniel Shartin, Anne Falke, Frank S. Minasian and David Twiss, said they believed a quorum of the board violated the law by discussing the proposed side arms policy and deliberating toward a decision at a private, on-campus dinner preceding the Nov. 8 meeting.

They sought a preliminary injunction that would have prohibited college officials from implementing the side arms policy until a court hearing on the merits of their lawsuit.

Judge Bruce R. Henry, who held a hearing Monday in Worcester Superior Court on the injunction request, denied it yesterday.

In his opposition to the issuance of an injunction, James B. Cox, a lawyer for the trustees, said the 10 trustees who voted on the side arms policy filed affidavits in which they denied discussing the issue during the social dinner preceding the open meeting.

In denying the injunction request, Judge Henry said the plaintiffs failed to establish either that they had a likelihood of success on the merits of their case or that irreparable harm would befall them if the injunction were not issued.

The side arms policy approved by the trustees, which was recommended by college President Janelle Ashley to promote safety on campus, is contingent upon the school developing a formal policy on side arms and use of force, and on the training and assessment of Worcester State’s 16 police officers.

Brandon Huggon, the student representative on the board of trustees, was the only one to vote against the change. He said he supported it personally but voted on the basis of a student poll in which 155 students indicated they were against arming campus police and 148 were for it.



Posted by: SinePari

I don't know if there are unions or each college is its own fifth column. But again, why have a board of trustees handle public safety of a state college? I'm not looking for a complete take over by the state but they need a uniform policy, training and a UOF continuum for all. Mass Bay and Framingham State can be just as much of a target as Bunker Hill, Holyoke, QCC etc.



Posted by: JMB1977

Like WSC and Framingham, QCC and even Holy Cross...all have area's directly off campus that is a breeding ground for crime to happen and I know at Holy Cross most to all of the College Administrators think that the College(s) are protected behind those big iron gates and fences. Hopefully all the Colleges will eventually be on board with the firearm issue in the distant future.



Posted by: rg1283

Mass Bay for the most part is in a quiet area. They should be armed, but doubtful that will ever happen due to that idiotic president.

Holyoke, well its Holyoke the college its self is an okay area near the mall, but given the record of Holyoke and its crime areas, they should be armed.

Bunker Hill is right off of the orange line in Boston. Any school that is in Boston should be armed. Shitbird express trains can deliver shitbirds to your school very quickly.

QCC should be armed, I thought a lot of those 50 y/o dinosaurs died off and left. I haven't heard of any community colleges getting armed recently or pushing for weapons.

If the agency has Police powers they should be armed period. With the exception of the DMH and DMR police, in which it would be less beneficial for them to be armed considering their work environments.



Posted by: sgt128-13

Quote:
Originally Posted by fscpd907
The side arms policy approved by the trustees, which was recommended by college President Janelle Ashley to promote safety on campus, is contingent upon the school developing a formal policy on side arms and use of force, and on the training and assessment of Worcester State’s 16 police officers.
Seems like that should've been taken care of long ago. All about getting you're ducks in a row!



Posted by: Kilvinsky

Should someone start demanding the resignation* of those faculty members who filed the injunction on the basis that they are toying with the very safety and lives of not only the Police Officers involved but the community as a whole? The injunction, which COULD have gone the other way (thankfully there was a sane judge) and the process could have been stalled indefinitely, and over the hissy-fit of a few backwards thinking, ivory tower types who seem to feel they are impervious to any bad things from the outside world. Only the COPS are the threat.

These are the very type of people who are indirectly responsible for what happened on 9-11. This is a local issue, but it's that type of mindset that puts us all at risk.

*Of course no one will resign and no one in an administrative capacity will ask for it, but it always seems that someone is demanding the resignation of someone (usually liberals make the demand), why shouldn't the Worcester State College Police make the same demand. Sure it's just show, but it's a message.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan8784
Trust me QCC is no where close to getting armed certain dinosaurs in to department dont like guns.
</IMG>
Sounds like 'certain dinosaurs' should be reclassified as security and the hiring process start to replace them. I would never advocate firing guys like that, they took the job believing it would be as is until retirement. It's not THEIR fault change has to happen, but is has to happen. Let them wait it out and retire, but reclassify them.



Posted by: SinePari

Does anybody know if ALL state colleges collectively fall under the same regulations? Hiring, firing, training, etc. If you're not armed and you're hired under the premise of being a "police" officer, then they could shit-can everyone and hire Wackenhut Security services for less money.



Posted by: mpd61

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinePari
Does anybody know if ALL state colleges collectively fall under the same regulations? Hiring, firing, training, etc. If you're not armed and you're hired under the premise of being a "police" officer, then they could shit-can everyone and hire Wackenhut Security services for less money.
Short answer:

1. ALL State/Community colleges fall under CH73/s.18 and CH15A/s.22 for their Police Authority. Hiring/training is a hodgepodge of different policies and practices at each school (so...no in that context)

2. As far as privatizing, ALL the state schools Have AFSCME as their CBA. In theory, the school can't just fire everybody. What they can do is as somebody leaves or retires, repost the position as a guard. Or they wait until about four or five positions open up and fill them "temporary" with contract people. Hasn't really been a problem historically.



Posted by: SinePari

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpd61
ALL State/Community colleges fall under CH73/s.18 and CH15A/s.22 for their Police Authority. Hiring/training is a hodgepodge of different policies and practices at each school (so...no in that context).
So therein lies the rub. Too many convoluted policies for basically the same jurisdiction at each school. Federal property has a uniform policy at all federal sites. So there should be a uniform policy for all state schools. AFSCME should step in, put the administrations in the frying pan and get everyone on the same page.



Posted by: id1811xecj

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinePari
So therein lies the rub. Too many convoluted policies for basically the same jurisdiction at each school. Federal property has a uniform policy at all federal sites.
I do not think that the federal government is entirely uniform. VA Po
lice only recently got armed. sstill, it is better than at the state level.



Posted by: SinePari

Well, I don't know much about AFSCME, but I just read on their website they're endorsing Hillary Clinton. So I don't think they'll be pushing to help you get armed anytime soon .



Posted by: mpd61

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinePari
Well, I don't know much about AFSCME, but I just read on their website they're endorsing Hillary Clinton. So I don't think they'll be pushing to help you get armed anytime soon .
Right again Dude! Thats why MCLEA (not MACLEA) was formed and the severance issue is currently before the LRC.

FUCK AFSCME!!!! they do nothing for cops in Mass.



Posted by: SinePari

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpd61
Right again Dude! Thats why MCLEA (not MACLEA) was formed and the severance issue is currently before the LRC.

FUCK AFSCME!!!! they do nothing for cops in Mass.
If you don't like your representation, BECOME the representation.



Posted by: Dan8784

Quote:
Originally Posted by SinePari
West Boylston St has its share of criminal activity and anybody with uniform should armed. Every now and then I'll swing by QCC while on patrol and a lot of times I'll make an arrest for something I wasn't even looking for.
Not just W. Boylston st. We obviously have alot of students from the Valley and all over Worcester. It is ridiculous that we dont have firearms. We have a uniform that says police and cruisers that say police, and the students know that we are not armed, we are targets.



Posted by: Inspector71

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan8784
Not just W. Boylston st. We obviously have alot of students from the Valley and all over Worcester. It is ridiculous that we dont have firearms. We have a uniform that says police and cruisers that say police, and the students know that we are not armed, we are targets.
Well...
Get on at WPI or Clark if you want to carry a rod



Posted by: SinePari

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan8784
Not just W. Boylston st. We obviously have alot of students from the Valley and all over Worcester. It is ridiculous that we dont have firearms. We have a uniform that says police and cruisers that say police, and the students know that we are not armed, we are targets.
On more than one ocassion I've seen the knuckleheads that come to pick up their girlfriends or whatever and they're trying to be tough guys driving around. We were leaving class minding our own business and had a beef one night with a guy who threw his arms up saying the "you don't know who I am" crap.

3 of us were armed, sworn POs, and just talked the guy into his car and sent him home with his tail between his legs. I'm not waiting for you guys to show up with NO weapons, that's for sure.



Posted by: 5-0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inspector71
Well...
Get on at WPI or Clark if you want to carry a rod
Well... That just solved the whole unarmed PD problem. Thanks Inspector71.



Posted by: Kilvinsky

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inspector71
Well...
Get on at WPI or Clark if you want to carry a rod
I'm not fond of Democrats, but I stay here in Mass. and hope, work and vote for change. I don't move to a red state. I don't fault anyone who gets fed up with not making headway and moves on, but I RESPECT those who work for change rather than just give up.

But I noticed the wink, so I ain't yellin' atcha Inspector, just speakin' my mind is all.





ma police, boston ma police, massachusetts police, massachusetts police, mass state police, mass police, ma, mass, massachusetts, massachusetts, massachutes, massachusetts law, massachusetts polece, police, officer, police officer, cops, police gear, law enforcement, police duty gear, state police, sheriff, law, police supply, police agency directory, police agency, police department, traffic officer, police dept, state trooper, dispatcher, massachusetts county sheriff, massachusetts sheriff, massachusetts department of corrections, ma doc, doc, dept of corrections, police information, civil service, ma civil service, massachusetts crime, police training, police academy, ma police academy, massachusetts officers, masscop, masscops, mpa, bpa, ibpoa, police association, massachusetts police news, massachusetts crime news, mass most wanted, police career information, police patrol, police administration, police books, crime scene training, police discussion, crime discussions, cops

About MassCops, the home for Massachusetts law enforcement.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network opened in 1998 and is now a part of the New England Police Network The site is a pro-police discussion forum intended for sworn police officers and civilian law enforcement officials as well as those interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement here in Massachusetts.

The goal of The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network is to provide an informal network of law enforcement officials here in Massachusetts for educational and informational purposes.

The forum covers many topics such as Police Related News Articles, Agency & Profession Discussions, Police Training as well as Law Enforcement Career Information.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network and The New England Police Network (NEPN) and it's network sites are privately owned websites/domains and are not affiliated with or endorsed by any government association or agency.

MassCops (masscops.com) and (masscop.com) are privately owned are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Massachusetts Coalition of Police (masscop.org)



vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser

3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 49 50 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108