Published: September 3 2007 19:00 | Last updated: September 4 2007 09:00
Lieutenant General Robert Elder, senior Air Force officer for cyberspace issues, recently joked that North Korea “must only have one laptop” to make the more serious point that every potential adversary – except Pyongyang – routinely scans US computer networks.
North Korea may be impotent in cyberspace, but its neighbour is not. The Chinese military sent a shiver down the Pentagon’s spine in June by successfully hacking into an unclassified network used by the top policy advisers to Robert Gates, the defence secretary.
While the People’s Liberation Army has been probing Pentagon networks hundreds of times a day for the past few years, the US is more alarmed at the growing frequency and sophistication of the attacks.
The Pentagon spent several months deflecting the recent onslaught before the PLA penetrated its system, which was shut down for more than a week for diagnosis.
While officials are concerned that it downloaded information, they are more concerned about the strategic ramifications.
“The PLA has demonstrated the ability to conduct attacks that disable our system . . . and the ability in a conflict situation to re-enter and disrupt on a very large scale,” said a former official, who added that the PLA has also penetrated the networks of US defence companies and think-tanks.
One senior US official said there was “no doubt” that China was now monitoring email traffic on unclassified government networks.
Intelligence professionals say China has found a simple way to compensate for its lack of expertise in recruiting non-Chinese spies in the US.
China has also come under scrutiny outside Washington. At a recent press conference with the German chancellor Angela Merkel, Wen Jiabao, the Chinese premier, expressed “grave concern” over reports that the PLA had used “Trojan Horse” programs to insert spyware into German government networks.
While Chinese military doctrine stresses the importance of cyberspace, many other countries, including the US, engage in electromagnetic trespassing.
This year, for example, Estonia accused Russia of orchestrating a massive attack that temporarily crippled government networks.
The Defence Science Board, an independent Pentagon advisory group, will soon publish a study on non-conventional military challenges that will examine cyber threats.
A former senior US official said while the US had made headway, much more needed to be done.
The US Air Force will soon create a cyber war-fighting command aimed at improving defensive and offensive capabilities to counter such asymmetric threats. “We want to ensure that we can operate freely in the domain,” says Major General Charles Ickes, another senior Air Force official involved with cyberspace issues. “On the other hand . . . it is seen by everybody in the defence department as a war-fighting domain and you must have offensive capability.”
Gen Ickes says the military must ensure that its actions do not inadvertently impact on US civilian computer systems. Michael Green, former senior Asia adviser to President George W. Bush, points to an example where the Pentagon had to consider the legal ramifications of blasting a virus back at a hacker.
In an increasingly networked world, governments must consider an even wider range of cyber threats, including terrorist attacks on critical infrastructure, commercial espionage, and old-fashioned spying.
France and Germany have imposed restrictions on senior officials using BlackBerries out of concerns that US intelligence agencies could intercept sensitive emails.
Voicing similar concerns, the White House has also imposed a ban on officials using the devices in some countries, including China. It is also examining whether to restrict domestic use, in a move to panic large swaths of Washington’s BlackBerry-addicted officialdom.
Sami Saydjari, chief executive of Cyber Defense Agency and a former Pentagon cyber expert, warns of the potential for terrorist groups, such as al-Qaeda, to attack the financial, telecoms, and power sectors.
To underscore the threat, he notes that no cyber red team – hackers enlisted to attack systems to help identify weaknesses – has ever failed to meet its objective.
Gregory Garcia, the assistant secretary for cyber security at the department of Homeland Security, says the number of cyber incidents reported to the department’s computer readiness team so far this year is 35,000. That compares to 4,100 for the whole of 2005.
technology.timesonline.co.uk — Chinese military hackers have prepared a detailed plan to disable America’s aircraft battle carrier fleet with a devastating cyber attack, according to a Pentagon report obtained by The Times.
Posted by: Killjoy
I think the effects listed in the article are way overblown. The most sensitive US military networks are not connected to outside sources, hence invulnerable to hacking. Interference with civilian networks, while highly inconvenient for joe citizen, don't critically interfere with military operations. They say in the article they could 70% of electrical grids for six months? I don't think so, necessity is mother of invention..Americans are good at improvising, adapting and overcoming. I would bet that the effects of any massive cyber-attack could overcome in matter of days, not months.
I also fail to see how hackers could disable a carrier battle group. What exactly would stop the F/A-18's from flying, dropping bombs and firing missiles? Its not like the aircraft run on Dell's loaded with Microsoft Windows. The engineers on the CVN's will still get their nuclear reactors up to speed and drive the shafts that propel the ships. The aviation ordinance men will still hang the bombs. The emphasis on Command, Control, Communication, and Intelligence, sometimes make people forget that militaries have been fighting wars long before we had computers. Do computers increase access to intelligence assets and make communication easier? Of course they do, but some military planners have noted that warfighters are sometimes swamped with information, making swift decisions more, not less difficult. If some carrier group commander had to make a decision without consulting the Pentagon, would that be a disaster?
I think that the cyber doom types often think that we exist only because we are tied to some kind of intricate network of cellphones, laptops and PDA's. Wrong, these things exist to make our life easier, our lives don't depend on them. I would like to see some hacker program away the inbound cannon shell headed for his house.
Posted by: justanotherparatrooper
Amen Killjoy!
ma police, boston ma police, massachusetts police, massachusetts police, mass state police, mass police, ma, mass, massachusetts, massachusetts, massachutes, massachusetts law, massachusetts polece, police, officer, police officer, cops, police gear, law enforcement, police duty gear, state police, sheriff, law, police supply, police agency directory, police agency, police department, traffic officer, police dept, state trooper, dispatcher, massachusetts county sheriff, massachusetts sheriff, massachusetts department of corrections, ma doc, doc, dept of corrections, police information, civil service, ma civil service, massachusetts crime, police training, police academy, ma police academy, massachusetts officers, masscop, masscops, mpa, bpa, ibpoa, police association, massachusetts police news, massachusetts crime news, mass most wanted, police career information, police patrol, police administration, police books, crime scene training, police discussion, crime discussions, cops
About MassCops, the home for Massachusetts law enforcement.
The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network opened in 1998 and is now a part of the New England Police Network The site is a pro-police discussion forum intended for sworn police officers and civilian law enforcement officials as well as those interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement here in Massachusetts.
The goal of The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network is to provide an informal network of law enforcement officials here in Massachusetts for educational and informational purposes.
The forum covers many topics such as Police Related News Articles, Agency & Profession Discussions, Police Training as well as Law Enforcement Career Information.
The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network and The New England Police Network (NEPN) and it's network sites are privately owned websites/domains and are not affiliated with or endorsed by any government association or agency.
MassCops (masscops.com) and (masscop.com) are privately owned are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Massachusetts Coalition of Police (masscop.org)
ma police, boston ma police, massachusetts police, massachusetts police, mass state police, mass police, ma, mass, massachusetts, massachusetts, massachutes, massachusetts law, massachusetts polece, police, officer, police officer, cops, police gear, law enforcement, police duty gear, state police, sheriff, law, police supply, police agency directory, police agency, police department, traffic officer, police dept, state trooper, dispatcher, massachusetts county sheriff, massachusetts sheriff, massachusetts department of corrections, ma doc, doc, dept of corrections, police information, civil service, ma civil service, massachusetts crime, police training, police academy, ma police academy, massachusetts officers, masscop, masscops, mpa, bpa, ibpoa, police association, massachusetts police news, massachusetts crime news, mass most wanted, police career information, police patrol, police administration, police books, crime scene training, police discussion, crime discussions, cops