MassCops - Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network, A Mass Police Web Portal

Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network

Massachusetts Police News, Information and Discussions on MassCops



Pages: 1

Main Page

You knew this was coming.......

(Click here to view the original thread on the MassCops Message Board)


Posted by: Delta784

Full text;

http://ledger.southofboston.com/arti...ion/opin01.txt

OUR VIEW: Unbiased answers needed


By The Patriot Ledger

No one can predict what they would do when confronted in a potentially deadly situation by an apparently delusional and suicidal person waving a bloody knife.

So it is impossible for any of us to say with certainty that Quincy police could have handled the fatal shooting of James Hart differently.

We can say, however, that Norfolk District Attorney William Keating was far too hasty with his irresponsible pronouncement in the hours following the encounter that the six officers who responded were justified in killing Hart, 65.

That is not a determination that can be made in the emotional moments immediately following such a traumatic standoff, and we think Attorney General Martha Coakley should appoint a special prosecutor to fully probe the response and actions by Quincy police and the district attorney’s office.

A full and complete investigation is needed to provide answers to the Hart family and city residents as well as to give the responding officers an opportunity to clear their names without the perception that it was being broomed under the rug by officials who want it to go away.

By his pronouncement at a press conference shortly after the shooting that Hart’s death was ‘‘suicide by police,’’ Keating exhibited a predetermination that would be hard for him to overcome as the person overseeing such an investigation. In addition, Keating’s need to maintain a relationship with Quincy police as well as deal with any inherent conflict that might arise from his office’s investigation would also preclude any report from his office from being seen as unbiased.

Hart, according to family members, suffered from depression for a quarter century. He tried to kill himself at least once before and when police responded to his Wollaston home, he was in the backyard, bloody from self-inflicted wounds and threatening police with a 12-inch kitchen knife.

Many of Hart’s family members, including two granddaughters, were barricaded in the house during the standoff and did not witness the shooting. But they did hear shouting and then three shots, one of which his daughter said was to her father’s head.

Family members angrily charged the Quincy police did not do enough to subdue Hart and questioned why a shot to the arm or leg was not sufficient to thwart an attack by a senior citizen against armed police. Many others, including us, would like that answer as well. Because someone asks police to kill him does not mean they have to comply...........



Posted by: MM1799

I'm sure the Quincy PD appreciates your monday morning QBing from your armchair. Until you have to deal with "troubled" individuals who have the capability and the willingness to hurt themselves and/or the police, shut the fuck up.

This attitude that every situation can be dealt with with verbal commands and politically correct actions is pathetic. Join the real world, will you? I don't know any of the officers but I am sure Delta can attest that these officers are probably second guessing themselves and feel terrible about the situation.

Delta please let these officers know they have my full support.



Posted by: phuzz01

I have a hard enough time hitting anywhere on the target under no-stress untimed range conditions. So making an arm or leg shot when someone is trying to kill me is simply a no-go...



Posted by: kwflatbed

OK guys instead of posting your comments here lets send the
Quincy Patriot Ledger the comments.

To send a letter to the editor or an opinion column:

The Patriot Ledger
400 Crown Colony Drive
P.O. Box 699159
Quincy, MA 02269-9159
(617) 786-7000
Editor:
Phone: 617-786-7076
Fax: 617-786-7393
E-mail: editpage@ledger.com



Posted by: Sniper

Good work QPD !!!!!!!!



Posted by: pahapoika

my email to the Ledger

so the next time a family calls the cops about some lunatic chasing them with a knife , we can call the patriot ledger and have some news reporter come and take the knife from him ?



Posted by: Andy0921

Boo fucking hoo!

Every douche bag always pulls the "couldn't you have just shot him in the leg?" card after something like this.

uber-bullshit.



Posted by: BB-59

I am going to add my imput here with the out front understanding that a.) I was not there and b.) that my answer reflects the way I instruct LE to deal with a suicide by cop incident.

1. There has been no mandates (to the best of my knowledge) from the courts in how an officer responds to a lethal force encounter. The MPTC uses the Grahm v. Conner as their suggested guideline in officer use of force.

If these officers are judged by there actions then there actions must be judged by what another LE OFFICER with the same relative experience and training would or could be expected to do. Also department policy and procedures must also be added to the equation as to how the officers responded and acted.

Perception by the public means reality. Most of the public (and believe or not LE) get most of the information about police from movies that are made for enjoyment and selling movie tickets. LE, from the top of the chain to the beat cop must start doing a better job in explaining that what Bruce Willis and Mel Gibson do in the movies IS NOT REALITY!

Citizen police academies are an excellent source to bond with the public and if they are done properly a fantastic way to hands on demonstrate, say the Tuller Drill. This can be done with simunitions some safety equipment and magic marker. Demonstrate this not only to civilians, but the DA, and the press, and they can see why shooting "Hollywood Style" in the leg, arm, and chest dose not work in the real world where split second decisions, stress, and reality actually come into play.

We have addressed this issue in the past at inservice and new instructor and instructor resorts, and the usual reaction is "what is the difference, I will deal with it like any lethal force situation".

This is where training and department policy and procedure has to be up to date and have officers ready to respond to this type of situation and the department ready to respond to the not only the DA, but the family and public in general.

When LE confronts a suspect shooting at a schoolyard with an AR-15 the public understand that lethal force is an option. But they know from TV and the movies that if it is a "little old man" that they should be able to use a fancy martial art move and disarm him. Or how about a kid who points a gun at police or innocent civilians and opens fires or points the gun and at police or innocents do we train our officers not to shoot in case it is not a real gun?

We use airsoft guns that resemble GLOCKs they look, feel, and actually function the same as a real gun. There is no known way under a stressful, rapidly evolving situation that an officer can tell the two apart. If a kid points that gun at police pulls the trigger the officer will return fire. Even though there is no "BANG" the sight of what looks like a gun the slide moving back will compel an officer to protect themselves and the public and respond.

Remember that it has been proven that visual, auditory, and fine motor skills diminish under stress.



Posted by: kwflatbed

Quote:
Originally Posted by BB-59
I am going to add my imput here with the out front understanding that a.) I was not there and b.) that my answer reflects the way I instruct LE to deal with a suicide by cop incident.

1. There has been no mandates (to the best of my knowledge) from the courts in how an officer responds to a lethal force encounter. The MPTC uses the Grahm v. Conner as their suggested guideline in officer use of force.

If these officers are judged by there actions then there actions must be judged by what another LE OFFICER with the same relative experience and training would or could be expected to do. Also department policy and procedures must also be added to the equation as to how the officers responded and acted.

Perception by the public means reality. Most of the public (and believe or not LE) get most of the information about police from movies that are made for enjoyment and selling movie tickets. LE, from the top of the chain to the beat cop must start doing a better job in explaining that what Bruce Willis and Mel Gibson do in the movies IS NOT REALITY!

Citizen police academies are an excellent source to bond with the public and if they are done properly a fantastic way to hands on demonstrate, say the Tuller Drill. This can be done with simunitions some safety equipment and magic marker. Demonstrate this not only to civilians, but the DA, and the press, and they can see why shooting "Hollywood Style" in the leg, arm, and chest dose not work in the real world where split second decisions, stress, and reality actually come into play.

We have addressed this issue in the past at inservice and new instructor and instructor resorts, and the usual reaction is "what is the difference, I will deal with it like any lethal force situation".

This is where training and department policy and procedure has to be up to date and have officers ready to respond to this type of situation and the department ready to respond to the not only the DA, but the family and public in general.

When LE confronts a suspect shooting at a schoolyard with an AR-15 the public understand that lethal force is an option. But they know from TV and the movies that if it is a "little old man" that they should be able to use a fancy martial art move and disarm him. Or how about a kid who points a gun at police or innocent civilians and opens fires or points the gun and at police or innocents do we train our officers not to shoot in case it is not a real gun?

We use airsoft guns that resemble GLOCKs they look, feel, and actually function the same as a real gun. There is no known way under a stressful, rapidly evolving situation that an officer can tell the two apart. If a kid points that gun at police pulls the trigger the officer will return fire. Even though there is no "BANG" the sight of what looks like a gun the slide moving back will compel an officer to protect themselves and the public and respond.

Remember that it has been proven that visual, auditory, and fine motor skills diminish under stress.
I hope that you sent this :
OK guys instead of posting your comments here lets send the
Quincy Patriot Ledger the comments.

To send a letter to the editor or an opinion column:

The Patriot Ledger
400 Crown Colony Drive
P.O. Box 699159
Quincy, MA 02269-9159
(617) 786-7000
Editor:
Phone: 617-786-7076
Fax: 617-786-7393
E-mail: editpage@ledger.com



Posted by: SinePari

Good luck Bruce. I know you have your hands full right now. If there's a public hearing on the matter, make sure you post it so we can pack the place.



Posted by: 94c

if he was a REAL MAN he would have done it himself.

COWARD.



Posted by: BrickCop

Every police chief and training academy in the state should issue a press release informing the public that the police are not trained to shoot knives/firearms/weapons out of a suspect's hands or "just shoot in the arm/leg".

The Editorial staff of the Ledger should also be cordially invited to participate in a practical training excerise in which a knife wielding suspect is attempting to gut them like a fish; I'm curious how many arm/leg shots there'd be.

Honest to God, how clueless are these people? I don't see cops lecturing newspaper people about how to write stories, print papers or which headlines to use. Then again most cops are smart enough to realize they're not qualified to judge (on how to do) an occupation that they've never held.



Posted by: 187

Quincy PD, stand by for tasers. I bet you'll have them within a year.



Posted by: RodneyFarva

"Family members angrily charged the Quincy police did not do enough to subdue Hart and questioned why a shot to the arm or leg was not sufficient to thwart an attack by a senior citizen against armed police. Many others, including us, would like that answer as well. Because someone asks police to kill him does not mean they have to comply"

allways shoot to Kill.... a corpes can't testify.



Posted by: Delta784

Quote:
Originally Posted by 187
Quincy PD, stand by for tasers. I bet you'll have them within a year.
Guess again;

http://www.boston.com/news/local/art...uns/?page=full

"We are not going to carry them or use them at the Quincy Police Department while I am the chief," said Chief Robert Crowley. "I think they're too dangerous."



Posted by: kwflatbed

Chief Robert Crowley Is a roaring IDIOT.
He does nothing to benifit the troops protecting the city of Quincy.
Not enough manpower on the streets.
No equipment to get the job done.
Until he is removed as Chief nothing will change.



Posted by: BB-59

The sad part is he stating what most LE and corrections agencies heads feel about deploying TASERS. I am a MPTC instructor for energy weapons (TASER) as well as a TASER certified instructor and feel they would benefit LE and corrections alike.

It has already been forgotten the resistance to OC. Same problem the press gave the impression of deaths caused by using it, and law Enforcement did a lousy initial job of explaining to the public why it was needed, and how and when it would be deployed.

Please understand that TASER, like OC, baton, Def. Tactics and firearms are never 100% effective. But the more tools an officer has to choose from, the more effective they become and as a result the public is better protected.

Remember perception is reality, we (LE) must be ready to effectively communicate why we do what we do, and why we employ our equipment.
The public think along the lines of what Hollywood has sold them as reality.



Posted by: Killjoy

That's the problem with having untrained civilians, most who have never even held a firearm, giving their opinions on these matters. As others have said, in lieu of real facts, most people fall back on what they know from movies and TV...does watching episodes of ER qualify me to perform medicine or criticize doctors?

Police shooting have many things in common, and the most common element is the lack of time we have to react. Action always beats reaction, and the police are always behind the eight-ball when it comes to using deadly force. That is because we are always reacting to the movements of the suspect...we usually have less than a second to:

1. Recognize the movement as a hostile action
2. Decide what the appropriate response is
3. Act on that decision

All of this occurs in a matter of seconds.

A man wielding a knife or other hand weapon, no matter his age or physical condition (assuming he is mobile) can cross 21 feet in two seconds or less. This is less than the amount of time it takes an officer to recognize the attack, and draw his weapon and deal with the attack. Because of this and other factors police are always taught to shoot at the available center mass of their threats. This helps them hit the target and respond as quickly as they can.

The so-called "shooting them in the leg" or "shooting the gun out out of someone's hand" is pure Hollywood fantasy, neither action being appropriate to stop a threat. There are only two methods that will stop a deadly threat; 1. Rapid cardiovascular decompression (stopping the heart) 2. Neurological Shock (shutting down the brain), and neither the hand nor leg will produce these results quickly enough.

No one becomes a police officer with the hope that they can kill somebody...most people became police officers because they want to help people and make society a slightly better place. But policing does carry with it the terrible responsibility that we may have to take a life to save someone else's our defend our own lives. It is a burden we carry every day we put on the uniform. Words are much like bullets, once they are fired they cannot be put back. Reporters and politicians need to ask themselves if ill-educated opinion and a desire for publicity are the best way to express their confusion on an incident that has occurred. Let the professionals; police officers and district attorneys analyze the incident and give their measured and educated opinions...if they feel the issue is settled, then maybe its best left to them. Or, maybe the next time you fly you should get up and tell the pilot the best way to land a plane.



Posted by: GreenMachine

I had almost this identical scenario during simunitions at the academy. The instructor (an older woman) was playing an out of control drunk who when confronted pulled out a (training) knife and lunged at me. On instinct I shot her in the thigh. If it was because she was older, or a woman, even the fact that I thought it was "just a knife", I don't know. What I do know is I was wrong and got my ass reamed for not shooting as trained (center mass, and or failure drill). Pretty much if I did that in a real situation I was advised I would not have a leg to stand on (forgive the pun). Shoot as trained!



Posted by: Andy0921

Very well said, Killjoy

You should send that to the editor.



Posted by: LA Copper

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta784
Guess again;

http://www.boston.com/news/local/art...uns/?page=full

"We are not going to carry them or use them at the Quincy Police Department while I am the chief," said Chief Robert Crowley. "I think they're too dangerous."
Bruce,
If you want, let's you and I have a face to face with your chief and we can explain to him the reasons why Tasers are a good thing. Who knows, maybe we'll get lucky.

From what I've read of this incident, it sounds like this was the perfect scenario for both a Taser and or a beanbag shotgun. Either way, this guy would most likely still be alive and this would all be a non-issue. These less lethal weapons are mandatory out this way for just such occasions.

As with all bad press, this too shall blow over. We have stuff like this happen all the time where the media makes a big deal about it for a little while and then something else comes along and it's forgotten about. (So far this year we have about 50 officer involved shootings so I speak from experience.)



Posted by: kwflatbed

Pass this on to the idiot chief:

New Haven Police To Use Non-Lethal Weapons
POSTED: 5:20 pm EDT July 10, 2007

NEW HAVEN, Conn. -- The New Haven Police Department has added 50 new non-lethal weapons to their arsenal.

It’s the first step in training all of their officers to carry Tasers and cut back on using guns.

Last week the police chief signed an order allowing 50 trained officers to carry the non-lethal weapons on the streets.
A police department representative said the goal is to train all officers how to effectively use Tasers to better handle suspects and avoid severely injuring or killing anyone.

http://www.nbc30.com/news/13656947/d...l?dl=mainclick



Posted by: SinePari

I'm still waiting for a patrol carbine. Let's start with lethal weapons before I get issued a non-lethal weapon.

I had a US civilian in Iraq ask me if we carried rubber bullets for crowd control...

HE (high explosive) 40mm rounds ARE crowd control.



Posted by: BrickCop

The media will always have an unrelenting obssession with use of force/pursuit incidents. It's sad that the editorial boards/columnists have no qualms about making uninformed/uneducated judgements about these issues despite the fact that they have zero training or experience in LE.

I know there was a FL college professor who's anti- cop mentality did a 180 after he accepted a challenge to put himself through an academy and work the street for a period of time. I'm curious what would happen if the MPTC offered every major MA media outlet an opportunity to send one of their reporters to a full time police academy.



Posted by: Delta784

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrickCop
I know there was a FL college professor who's anti- cop mentality did a 180 after he accepted a challenge to put himself through an academy and work the street for a period of time.
George Kirkham;

http://www.krimedr.com/

The book he wrote about his experiences, Signal Zero, should be required reading for all college CJ professors.



Posted by: dcs2244

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta784
George Kirkham;

http://www.krimedr.com/

The book he wrote about his experiences, Signal Zero, would be required reading for all college CJ professors if they weren't already "The Masters of Reality" (tm) and "All That And A Bag of Chips" of the LE world.
There, Delta, fixed it for you (free of charge). Just axe Jim Fox.

In any event, the "Quincy Six" shall now have to face judgement at the hands of their "peers": An American jury (with the average educational level of seventh grade). I suggest the cops practice putting their testimony into a form that the worthies in the "box-o-rocks" can understand: American Idol, Survivor, Angel, Charmed and Growing up Gotti.

Good luck, guys. Been there, done that and got the T-shirt...

</IMG>



Posted by: mtc

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrickCop
The media will always have an unrelenting obssession with use of force/pursuit incidents. It's sad that the editorial boards/columnists have no qualms about making uninformed/uneducated judgements about these issues despite the fact that they have zero training or experience in LE.

I know there was a FL college professor who's anti- cop mentality did a 180 after he accepted a challenge to put himself through an academy and work the street for a period of time. I'm curious what would happen if the MPTC offered every major MA media outlet an opportunity to send one of their reporters to a full time police academy.

Though having never been,,,, I doubt they'd a) take them up on it, and b) never make it.

Why do you think they are "journalists" ?? They lack the stones to actually make a difference. Any semi-trained monkey can be a "journalist".



Posted by: dcs2244

Rope, tree, journalist...some assembly required.



Posted by: Delta784

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcs2244
There, Delta, fixed it for you (free of charge). Just axe Jim Fox.
I would love to have the good Doctor Fox ride with me some hot Saturday night this summer. He can show me how all his theoretical research can be applied in the real world.

Incidentally, Kirkham did his full-time 6-month stint with Jacksonville PD, then after he returned to teaching he became a reserve officer in Gainesville (where his school Florida State is located). When he came up for tenure, he received stiff opposition from established professors at FSU, who felt he was doing too much "practical field research"....i.e. making them look bad.

He eventually won tenure, and is now Professor Emeritus of Criminal Justice at FSU.



Posted by: SouthSideCobras

Police use Taser on man after chase

GateHouse News Service
Sat Jul 14, 2007, 12:24 AM EDT

Fall River - A man, who police were told was armed with a gun, was subdued with a Taser Thursday night after he refused to surrender, they said.

It subsequently was learned that the suspect, Omid K. White, 19, of 165 Sunset Hill, was carrying a beer bottle that he discarded during a foot chase by police.

White was arrested and charged with trespassing, resisting arrest/interfering with a police officer and drinking an alcoholic beverage on a public way.

Sgt. Paul Bernier said Officer Michael Pessoa responded about 10:30 p.m. to a 911 call from a woman who said a man was standing in the Sunset Hill playground, “holding a gun and threatening to fight with people.”

Pessoa and other officers “got within 30 feet of the man, who fled, holding an object in his hand,” Bernier said, reading from a police report.

After a foot pursuit, police found the man “hiding behind a fence behind a house on Penn Street, crouched down in a catcher’s position,” Bernier said.

“He was ordered to come out, but he refused,” he said.

Police, thinking he had a weapon in his hand, used the Taser on White, said Bernier.

“He gave up and was subdued. No gun was found,” he said.

Bernier said only a “single deployment” of the Taser was necessary to take the man into custody.

Bernier said the suspect told police that he was holding a beer bottle and that “he threw it while running from police.”

A Heineken beer bottle was recovered on the path of the chase, Bernier said.
White also told police he was at Sunset Hill to buy drugs, Bernier said.
Previously, White had been issued a “no-trespass” order by the Housing Authority to keep away from Sunset Hill, Bernier said.

White was taken to St. Anne’s Hospital after the incident.

E-mail John Moss at jmoss@heraldnews.com.



Posted by: BB-59

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthSideCobras
Police use Taser on man after chase

GateHouse News Service
Sat Jul 14, 2007, 12:24 AM EDT

Fall River - A man, who police were told was armed with a gun, was subdued with a Taser Thursday night after he refused to surrender, they said.

It subsequently was learned that the suspect, Omid K. White, 19, of 165 Sunset Hill, was carrying a beer bottle that he discarded during a foot chase by police.

White was arrested and charged with trespassing, resisting arrest/interfering with a police officer and drinking an alcoholic beverage on a public way.

Sgt. Paul Bernier said Officer Michael Pessoa responded about 10:30 p.m. to a 911 call from a woman who said a man was standing in the Sunset Hill playground, “holding a gun and threatening to fight with people.”

Pessoa and other officers “got within 30 feet of the man, who fled, holding an object in his hand,” Bernier said, reading from a police report.

After a foot pursuit, police found the man “hiding behind a fence behind a house on Penn Street, crouched down in a catcher’s position,” Bernier said.

“He was ordered to come out, but he refused,” he said.

Police, thinking he had a weapon in his hand, used the Taser on White, said Bernier.

“He gave up and was subdued. No gun was found,” he said.

Bernier said only a “single deployment” of the Taser was necessary to take the man into custody.

Bernier said the suspect told police that he was holding a beer bottle and that “he threw it while running from police.”

A Heineken beer bottle was recovered on the path of the chase, Bernier said.
White also told police he was at Sunset Hill to buy drugs, Bernier said.
Previously, White had been issued a “no-trespass” order by the Housing Authority to keep away from Sunset Hill, Bernier said.

White was taken to St. Anne’s Hospital after the incident.

E-mail John Moss at jmoss@heraldnews.com.

Great job by Fall River PD and very fair reporting by the Herald News.

I posted on this thread, (you new this was coming), on how we, LE have to start doing a better job communicating and educating not only our superiors, but the press, the public, and the DAs on how and why we employ force in certain situations.

A few years back Fall River PD was involved in a UOF incident that required the use of lethal force. They actually provided for the Herald their entire UOF policy and procedure which the Herald placed on the front page of there newspaper.

Now of course you had some people complain that the officers could have done something other than use lethal force. But the public as a whole understood that when a man confronts two police officers who are in uniform with a machete and refuses to comply with numerous orders to drop his weapon and was advancing on them that they had no option but to utilize there firearms.

Fall River PD serves as a good example that being open and having a good communication line to the parties I mentioned works.

Kudos to you Chief Souza and the FRPD as a whole!



Posted by: BrickCop

I'm glad it worked out for Fall River PD but many departments don't carry tasers. I don't know if you can necessarily compare this with the Quincy PD incident.



Posted by: BB-59

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrickCop
I'm glad it worked out for Fall River PD but many departments don't carry tasers. I don't know if you can necessarily compare this with the Quincy PD incident.
I did not intend to compare the two, and I apologize if my intent was misunderstood.

If anything I wanted to put forth what I feel was and is a good approach to dealing with civilians, press, and the DAs when dealing with the aftermath of UOF situations.

Unfortunately, LE in the real world is compared to actors in the entertainment industry. Bridging the gap is just one more area we need to better address.

Again, I apologize for any misunderstanding.



Posted by: fscpd907

State clears cops in Hart death: Officers had no choice, DA Keating says

By JOHN P. KELLY
The Patriot Ledger

QUINCY - The cabana house was surrounded by police. Inside, James Hart sat bleeding from his wrists, determined to die.

The 65-year-old, mentally disturbed and suicidal man, had slashed his arms with a kitchen knife and now gave more than a dozen officers who tried to dissuade him an ultimatum: either shoot him, or be stabbed. Then he raised the knife, charged outside, and soon was hovering above an officer who had lost his footing and fallen.

That is what led two Quincy police officers to shoot and kill Hart on July 3, according to accounts by police officers in a collection of reports released to The Patriot Ledger by Norfolk County District Attorney William Keating’s office. Keating, who concluded an investigation this week into the killing, determined patrol officers Paul Jackson and William Lanergan Jr. were justified in shooting Hart.

The State Police investigation was based largely on accounts from 18 Quincy police officers, and interviews with Hart’s family members, and neighbors who heard or witnessed the shooting.

A review of the material, including a 911 call made by Hart’s wife, Joan, and police radio communication during the incident, give a detailed look at what transpired just before Hart was shot three times, in the ankle, chest, and, lastly, the head.

‘‘We have a different story than the police,’’ Joan Hart said Friday.

The family received the same trove of police reports and is considering a wrongful-death lawsuit.

Theresa Hart, 38, the youngest of Hart’s five children, said she was scheduled Friday to meet with a lawyer.
She said at least two neighbors who witnessed the shooting believe Hart was not carrying a knife when he charged from the cabana.

‘‘There are a lot of things that don’t make sense to us,’’ she said.

‘‘We’re not out to get innocent police officers in trouble,’’ Theresa Hart said. ‘‘We just want to make sure the situation was handled properly.’’

Police Chief Robert Crowley said the six officers put on paid leave after the shooting had been returned to active duty.
‘‘I stand by the district attorney,’’ Crowley said. ‘‘I’m confident it was a fair and objective investigation. It’s a tragedy, but the officers acted properly.’’

‘Suspect down’: Anatomy of the Grand View shooting

Joan Hart called 911 the morning of July 3 and reported that her husband James had cut his wrists. Police and paramedics responded. The confrontation that followed ended with police fatally shooting the 65-year-old suicidal man.

The Norfolk County District Attorney’s office released reports this week at the request of The Patriot Ledger from 18 police officers at the scene. Their accounts illuminate what led to the poolside shooting at 32 Grand View Ave.

Joan Hart, in a 911 call at 9:57 a.m.:

—‘‘I’m calling from 32. ... My husband just cut his wrists; I want someone to come.’’

Officer John O’Donnell, first on the scene, over the radio:

—‘‘I’ve got this guy at gunpoint here; he’s making threats. I told him I wouldn’t shoot him.’’

Officer Michael Brandolini, the first back-up to arrive

—‘‘Patrolman O’Donnell was standing on the lower patio area, directing his conversation to (Hart) inside the cabana. ... O’Donnell was talking to Hart, pleading for him to drop the knife.’’

Detective Paul Delahoyde

—‘‘I activated my blue lights and siren on my unmarked cruiser and proceeded to the scene at 32 Grand View Ave. On arrival at the scene, I observed two marked cruiser and a Fallon ambulance on scene, their paramedics were standing on the sidewalk to the right of the house looking down to the yard.’’

Officer J. Cassidy

—‘‘I observed Hart, sitting down in a chair, holding a bloody carving knife approximately 10 to 12 inches long in his right hand. ... Hart had blood on his shirt and visible lacerations to his wrists.’’

Officer E.J. Hartnett

—‘‘The suspect also was yelling that if anyone came into the cabana he was going to stab them.’’

Officer Kristen Bowes

—‘‘There were several officers staged in front of the cabana and some had deployed their ballistic shields.’’

Officer Jack Keenan

—‘‘At that point several officers began to mace the suspect as he waved the knife in their direction.’’

Officer Kristen Bowes

—‘‘I, along with several officers on scene, began to cough from the OC that was sprayed.’’

Detective Paul L. Pieper

—‘‘(Hart) wiped the orange spray from his face and continued to rant and rave. He stated that he would kill anyone that came into the cabana.’’

Officer B. Flaherty

—‘‘Officer Keenan informed me that he was going to attempt to climb a window located at the rear of the cabana.’’

Officer Dennis J. Keenan

—‘‘The hayloft doors were secured by a wooden plank. My intentions were to open the hayloft door and gain Hart’s attention. I was hoping to distract him so that the officers at the side door could enter and disarm him.’’

Officer E.J. Hartnett

—‘‘I heard the officers’ commands and the suspect’s screams get louder, and then I heard someone yelling, ‘Look out! He’s coming out!’’’

Officer Paul Matthews

—‘‘Mr. Hart emerged, looking quite enraged and possessed from the cabana wielding an enormous blood-soaked butcher’s knife yelling in a high pitched tone, ‘‘You (expletive) better kill me, you better shoot!’’

We stepped backward down the brick steps leading to the patio from the cabana ... we both tumbled backwards down the steps.’’

Lt. Detective Patrick Glynn

—‘‘I then heard someone yell: ‘Watch out, watch out; he’s still got the knife.’ It was at this time I observed the individual again lunge in the area of officers Millane and Matthews.’’

Officer Mark Millane

—‘‘I could see Mr. Hart approach me and standing over me with the knife raised in his hand. Believing that I was going to be stabbed by Mr. Hart, I raised both my arms in front of me in a defensive position. At this time, I heard at least two and possibly three gun shots fired.’’

Officer Michael Brandolini

—‘‘Seconds later, Patrolman Lanergan screamed out, ‘‘Oh, (expletive), I think I shot him in the head.’’

Officer Stephen Cleary

—‘‘I holstered my weapon and cleared the 12-inch bloody knife from Hart’s right hand. Hart was taking agonal (difficult, painful) breaths.’’

Detective Paul Delahoyde

—‘‘I immediately ran back to the corner of the yard and shouted to the Fallon ambulance paramedics that were standing on the sidewalk in front of the house to come down to the pool area and give aid to Hart.’’

Lt. John D. Steele

—‘‘Officer Millane came walking up to Officer Lanergan and stated, ‘Billy, you saved my life. He was gonna stab me! You saved my life.’’’

Officer Kristen Bowes

—‘‘Officer Keenan and I immediately began to tape off the area with crime scene tape.’’

Officer J. Cassidy

—‘‘I followed the ambulance into Boston Medical Center. ... Hart was moved to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.’’

Lt. John D. Steele

—‘‘ ... he would later be pronounced dead.’’




Posted by: justanotherparatrooper

someone shouldve shot the knife out of his hands damn it and if the shot was timed right it couldve cauterized the wounds to his wrist saving his life instead of needlessly terminating this fine citizen of the community.



Posted by: SOT

Short version:
Suicide By Cop

EOT



Posted by: mpd61

Actually Officer Millane should have allowed himself to be stabbed, so that the other officers could have humanely tackled the poor upset gentleman to a soft landing on the lawn. After all, isn't that what Millane is paid to do?

GIVE ME A BREAK!

Nobody is talking about the officer involved trauma being suffered by the crew who responded. I hope they're getting EVERYTHING they need.



Posted by: pahapoika

there was a nice rebuttal to the newspaper's story on this shooting in last sundays patriot ledger. ( think the author was a MBTA cop )

as a side note

drove through Quincy last week and saw lots of people holding signs for Koch and Phelen ( allot more Koch signs )

either one of these guys a friend of the PD ?



Posted by: BB-59

Ok, The police chief, and the DA both say the officers were justified in there use of force.

I equate that to they followed department policy, procedure, and there training. Also (and just as important), the DA validated that they followed the laws of the commonwealth in there application of force.

What the family is doing is standard operating procedure; get a lawyer and sue and see what if any monetary reward comes there way.

I only hope that the officers are dealing with this situation knowing that they have the backing and assurance that they did there job to the best of there ability and followed the first lesson of LE, "at the end of your shift go home alive".




</IMG>



Posted by: GD

Quote:
Originally Posted by BB-59
I only hope that the officers are dealing with this situation knowing that they have the backing and assurance that they did there job to the best of there ability and followed the first lesson of LE, "at the end of your shift go home alive".
</IMG>
Agreed, 100%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Posted by: Delta784

It seems like the Ledger is feeling the heat for that piece of crap editorial;

OUR VIEW: Officers cleared in shooting death



By The Patriot Ledger

State Police assigned to the Norfolk District Attorney’s office have concluded that Quincy police acted appropriately when they shot and killed a 65-year-old mentally disturbed and suicidal man.

The July 3 incident raised a host of questions about the actions of Quincy police and their use of deadly force. Initially, District Attorney William R. Keating seemed to brush aside legitimate questions about the shooting death of James Hart, raising concerns about a rush to judgment on the actions of the officers.

A later and commendable decision by Keating and other law enforcement officials to release extensive evidence goes a long way in explaining to family members and city residents how the tragic situation unfolded.

According to accounts from some 18 Quincy police officers, interviews with Hart’s family members, neighbors who heard or witnessed the shooting, and police radio communications, the following transpired......

Full text;

http://www.patriotledger.com/article...ion/opin01.txt



Posted by: pahapoika

It seems like the Ledger is feeling the heat for that piece of crap editorial;

yeh , what was that all about ? sent them another email supporting the Quincy PD. they wanted my name , address and phone number ?



Posted by: dcs2244

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta784
It seems like the Ledger is feeling the heat for that piece of crap editorial;
There are still a lot of "buts" in their editorial: "...which may have been counter to police training..." and "...legitimate questions brushed aside...".

For those slow on the up-take, the lesson here is "Do Not Attack The Police with a Dangerous Instrument/Deadly Weapon". Immediate, unauthorized and catastrophic CPU shutdown/dll corruption may occur. No reboot, no reinstall of the OS to follow.

</IMG>



Posted by: 94c

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcs2244
There are still a lot of "buts" in their editorial: "...which may have been counter to police training..." and "...legitimate questions brushed aside...".

For those slow on the up-take, the lesson here is "Do Not Attack The Police with a Dangerous Instrument/Deadly Weapon". Immediate, unauthorized and catastrophic CPU shutdown/dll corruption may occur. No reboot, no reinstall of the OS to follow.

</IMG>
not only that, but you'll end up in the recycle bin.



Posted by: OCKS

I quit the ledger after the first editorial by phone and explained that it was because of the editorial content. I followed that up with a letter to the editor. The other day I recieved a letter asking if I wanted to restart the ledger and they asked to me to tell them why I quit. Phone calls are free so I called them to tell them that it was because of the editorial content she says Oh there is a note in the computer. I asked why then did they send me a letter she said she didn't know. This is why the ledger s--ks one hand doesn't know what the other is doing. I know some reporters from the ledger they are pretty good people but the editorial staff is turning the paper into a rag.
I believe some of you guys are right that they took a lot of heat and lost customers. I know they lost a lot of Quincy teachers over the way the ledger treated them on the teachers contracts and strike. Someone said you can vote with your pocketbook.



Posted by: Hutch

Why was this shooting even questionable? The guy attempted to use deadly force against an officer. Anyone with a fire arms permit had the right to shoot him in that situation, nevermind several police officers.



Posted by: 94c

[quote=Hutch]Why was this shooting even questionable? [quote]

it sells newspapers.



Posted by: Delta784

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcs2244
There are still a lot of "buts" in their editorial: "...which may have been counter to police training..." and "...legitimate questions brushed aside...".
You have to understand, this is MAJOR backpedaling for the Ledger. Their usual response to shooting themselves in the foot is to keep waving the flag, or just ignoring it and hoping it dies a quiet death.



Posted by: Killjoy

Quote:
Their usual response to shooting themselves in the foot is to keep waving the flag, or just ignoring it and hoping it dies a quiet death.
Much like their big brother in Boston, who would rather tell you again and again the sky is green before admitting a mistake. "Journalistic integrity" is a thing of the past.



Posted by: dcs2244

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94c
not only that, but you'll end up in the recycle bin.
Soylent Green is people111!11!!!!1!





ma police, boston ma police, massachusetts police, massachusetts police, mass state police, mass police, ma, mass, massachusetts, massachusetts, massachutes, massachusetts law, massachusetts polece, police, officer, police officer, cops, police gear, law enforcement, police duty gear, state police, sheriff, law, police supply, police agency directory, police agency, police department, traffic officer, police dept, state trooper, dispatcher, massachusetts county sheriff, massachusetts sheriff, massachusetts department of corrections, ma doc, doc, dept of corrections, police information, civil service, ma civil service, massachusetts crime, police training, police academy, ma police academy, massachusetts officers, masscop, masscops, mpa, bpa, ibpoa, police association, massachusetts police news, massachusetts crime news, mass most wanted, police career information, police patrol, police administration, police books, crime scene training, police discussion, crime discussions, cops

About MassCops, the home for Massachusetts law enforcement.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network opened in 1998 and is now a part of the New England Police Network The site is a pro-police discussion forum intended for sworn police officers and civilian law enforcement officials as well as those interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement here in Massachusetts.

The goal of The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network is to provide an informal network of law enforcement officials here in Massachusetts for educational and informational purposes.

The forum covers many topics such as Police Related News Articles, Agency & Profession Discussions, Police Training as well as Law Enforcement Career Information.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network and The New England Police Network (NEPN) and it's network sites are privately owned websites/domains and are not affiliated with or endorsed by any government association or agency.

MassCops (masscops.com) and (masscop.com) are privately owned are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Massachusetts Coalition of Police (masscop.org)



vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser

3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 49 50 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108