MassCops - Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network, A Mass Police Web Portal

Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network

Massachusetts Police News, Information and Discussions on MassCops



Pages: 1

Main Page

What is a ricer?

(Click here to view the original thread on the MassCops Message Board)


Posted by: rwdsw20

I was wondering if anybody could define the term ricer that I hear so often.



Posted by: KindaConfused

Genarally it's a asian import car. Honda, toyota, etc.



Posted by: Wolfman

Or more specifically, an absurdly modified or gaudily decorated small import car. Look for indicia like: "Snake eye" washer nozzle lamps, lowered so much that it gets hung up on a speed bump, the fart can exhaust, a 5-point racing harness on a car that won't exceed 80MPH, uber-low profile tires on chrome wheels (kind of look like someone wrapped electrical tape around the rim), and enough wings, spoilers, and ground effects to make the poor car look like it's having an allergic reaction to asphalt.



Posted by: susedan

^^^ Awesome response! LMAO



Posted by: Andy0921

(Ricer: from the latin word Ricarius meaning to suck at everything you attempt)

A person who makes unecessary modifications to their most often import car (hence the term "rice") to make it (mostly make it look) faster. The most common modifications are (but not limited to):

- Huge exhaust that serves no purpose but to make the car louder
- Large spoiler on the back that looks like something Boeing made for the 747
- Lots of after-market company stickers they don't have parts from, but must be cool
- Expensive rims that usually cost more than the car itself
- Bodykit to make the car appear lower, usually accented with chicken wire
- Clear tail lights and corner signals
- A "performace intake"- a tube that feeds cold air to their engine usually located in areas of excessive heat (behind or on top of the engine)
- Most of these riced cars (a.k.a. rice rockets or rice burners) are imports; Honda Civics, Accords, Integras, CRXs, RSXs, Del Sols Mitsubishi Eclipses, Lancers, Subaru Imprezas, however there are some domestics such as Chevrolet Caviliers, Dodge Neons, Ford Focus; small, slow, economy cars designed specifically to go slow. Please note that some Supras, Skylines, WRX's and other higher performance imports are designed to go fast, and are therfore not always considered rice. It really depends on the severity of the case.

The "ricer" attempts to make their car "performance" by adding the modifications listed above.
Honda Civics with big spoilers and 4" exhaust tips are considered to be ricers.



Posted by: BSP268

A White Hick In Roxbury



Posted by: RustyShackleford





Posted by: jettsixx

I would say a ricer is a car that looks like it belongs in one of the fast and furious movies. What sequel are they up to? I think its around part 19. I love writing them for the aftermarket lights on the wipers.



Posted by: kttref

My ricer makes awesome mashed potatoes...oh wait, that's a different type.



Posted by: 94c

Ricer Roni...

The San Francisco treat.



Posted by: tazoez

Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford

That's awesome, where did you find that or make it?



Posted by: rwdsw20

Wow! This whole time I thought the term ricer was some kind of secret code between police officers to make an arrest of some sort.



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman
Or more specifically, an absurdly modified or gaudily decorated small import car. Look for indicia like: "Snake eye" washer nozzle lamps, lowered so much that it gets hung up on a speed bump, the fart can exhaust, a 5-point racing harness on a car that won't exceed 80MPH, uber-low profile tires on chrome wheels (kind of look like someone wrapped electrical tape around the rim), and enough wings, spoilers, and ground effects to make the poor car look like it's having an allergic reaction to asphalt.
Wow! I have seen cars like that but I thought there where some kind of show car and those were called modifiers. Man if that is the case I need to get out more often. I appriciate the definition.

Can a ricer get a ticket? Or are they excempt because of there uniqueness and style.



Posted by: tazoez

Ticket:

Chapter 90: Section 7. Brakes, braking systems, mufflers, horns, lights, audible warning systems, and other equipment; compliance with safety standards; stickers and emblems


Section 7. Every motor vehicle operated in or upon any way shall be provided with brakes adequate to control the movement of such vehicle and conforming to rules and regulations made by the registrar, and such brakes shall at all times be maintained in good working order. Every automobile shall be provided with at least two braking systems, one of which shall be the service brake system, and the other shall be the parking brake system, each with a separate means of application, each operating directly or indirectly on at least two wheels and each of which shall suffice alone to stop said automobile within a proper distance as defined in said rules and regulations; provided, that if such systems are connected, combined or have any part in common, such systems shall be so constructed that a breaking of any one element thereof will not leave the automobile without brakes acting directly or indirectly on at least two wheels; and provided, further, that a tractor having a draw-bar pull rating of ten horse power or less and capable of a maximum speed of not more than eighteen miles an hour and designed specially for use elsewhere than on the traveled part of ways may be operated thereon if equipped with a single braking system which shall suffice to stop such tractor within a proper distance as aforesaid. Every automobile equipped with an hydraulic braking system whether or not assisted by other means, which provides braking action on four or more wheels, shall be equipped with a service brake system so arranged as to provide separate systems for at least two wheels and so designed and constructed that rupture or leakage-type failure of any single pressure component of the service brake system, except structural failures of the brake master cylinder body, effectiveness indicator body, or other housing common to the divided system, will not result in complete loss of function of the vehicle brakes when force on the brake pedal is continued. “Pressure component” means any internal component of the brake master cylinder or master control unit, wheel brake cylinder, brake line, brake hose, or equivalent, except vacuum assist components. Except in the case of a school bus or fire apparatus, every motor vehicle and every tractor which is designed and used for drawing another vehicle, having an unladen weight of more than ten thousand pounds, shall be equipped with full air brakes or hydraulic brakes with vacuum power assist or air power assist. All braking systems shall be constructed and designed so as to permit modulated control of brake application and release by the operator from the normal operating position. Every trailer or semi-trailer having an unladen weight of more than ten thousand pounds shall be equipped with air or electric brakes. One braking system shall be so constructed that it can be set to hold the automobile stationary. Each motorcycle shall have either a split service brake system or two independently actuated service brake systems. Any motorcycle which has a number or registration plate issued under the provisions of section six A of said chapter ninety or which was not manufactured with either a split service brake system or two independently actuated service brake systems, shall be required to have one brake system adequate to stop said motorcycle within a proper distance, as defined in rules and regulations made by the registrar. Every automobile used on a way by a person in giving driving instruction for compensation shall be equipped with dual brake controls whereby he may apply the brake while the pupil is driving. Every motor vehicle so operated shall be provided with a muffler or other suitable device to prevent unnecessary noise and with a suitable bell, horn or other means of signalling, with suitable lamps, and with a lock, key or other device to prevent such vehicle from being set in motion by unauthorized persons, or otherwise contrary to the will of the owner or person in charge thereof. Every automobile operated during the period from one half an hour after sunset to one half an hour before sunrise, and during any other period when visibility is reduced by atmospheric conditions so as to render dangerous further operation without lights being displayed, shall display at least two lighted white headlamps with at least one mounted at each side of the front of the vehicle or if parked within the limits of a way at least one white or amber light on the side of the automobile nearer the center of the way, and every motorcycle so operated at least one white headlamp and every such motorcycle with a sidecar attached, in addition, one such light on the front of the sidecar, and every motor truck, trailer and commercial motor vehicle used solely as such, having a carrying capacity of three tons or over, in addition, an amber light attached to the extreme left of the front of such vehicle, so attached and adjusted as to indicate the extreme left lateral extension of the vehicle or load, which shall in all cases aforesaid be visible not less than two hundred feet in the direction toward which the vehicle is proceeding or facing; provided, that an automobile need display no light when parked within the limits of a way in a space in which unlighted parking is permitted by the rules or regulations of the board or officer having control of such way. Every motor vehicle and trailer so operated shall be equipped with two rear lights mounted one at each side of the rear of the vehicle so as to show two red lights from behind and a white light so arranged as to illuminate and not obscure the rear number plate and shall be equipped with two stop lights mounted and displayed in a like manner of a type complying with minimum standards for construction and performance as the registrar may prescribe; provided, however, that a two-wheeled motorcycle, an antique motor car and a farm tractor need be equipped with only one such rear red light and one suitable stop light in addition to the number plate illuminator; and provided, further, that a trailer having a gross weight of three thousand pounds or less which does not obscure the required lights of the towing vehicle need be equipped with only one such rear red light and one white light so arranged as to illuminate and not obscure the rear number plate. No motor vehicle so operated shall mount or display a flashing, rotating or oscillating light in any direction except pursuant to section seven E of this chapter; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the use of rear directional signals nor to the proper use of vehicle hazard warning signals as provided for by this section. In no event, however, shall the registrar prohibit any commercial auto parts dealer, motor vehicle repair shop or station from selling, offering for sale or installing quartz-halogen headlamps which receive a certificate of approval from the American Association of Motor Vehicles Administrators or which meet the standards of the Canadian Standard Association (CSA) nor shall any provision of this section prohibit any person from using, purchasing or installing a quartz-halogen headlamp as herein described. Every motor vehicle or trailer so operated which carries a load or object extending four feet or more beyond the cab or body of such vehicle shall display at the extreme rear end of such load or object a red light plainly visible from a distance of at least five hundred feet to the sides and rear, and shall display in place thereof a red flag or cloth not less than twelve inches square during the period when motor vehicles are not required to display lights. Every commercial motor vehicle or trailer weighing, with its load, more than twelve thousand pounds, shall, in addition to such rear light, be equipped with a red reflector of a type complying with such minimum standards for construction and performance as the registrar may prescribe, so placed at the rear of such vehicle as to reflect rays of light thrown upon such reflector from behind. No headlamp or rear lamp shall be used on any motor vehicle so operated unless such headlamp or rear lamp is of a type complying with such minimum standards for construction and performance as the registrar may prescribe. Every motor vehicle shall be equipped with at least one mirror so placed and adjusted as to afford the operator a clear, reflected view of the highway to the rear and left side of the vehicle. Every motor vehicle or trailer, excepting passenger motor vehicles, operated in or upon any way shall be equipped with suitable guards which will effectively reduce the spray or splash to the rear of mud, water or slush caused by the rear wheels thereof. Every passenger motor vehicle which is equipped with tires which extend beyond the fenders or body of such vehicle and which is operated in or upon any way shall be equipped with flaps or suitable guards to reduce such spray or splash to the rear and sides. Every motor vehicle registered in the commonwealth which is privately owned and operated and designed for the carriage of passengers and which is used primarily for pleasure or for pleasure and business, including every such vehicle furnished for hire by a rental car agency but excluding every such vehicle used for public or commercial purposes, shall be equipped with two seat safety belts for the use of occupants of the front seats. No safety belt installed in a motor vehicle in accordance with the provisions of this section or in accordance with the provisions of federal law or the rules or regulations issued by the United States Department of Transportation, shall be removed from said motor vehicle except for the purpose of repairs. Every motor vehicle registered in the commonwealth shall be equipped with a device to permit the front and rear directional signals to flash simultaneously, said device to be operated only when the vehicle is disabled or stopped in the event of emergency on or at the side of any way.
No person shall sell, offer for sale or install on, or in, any motor vehicle or trailer, any component, device or substance, other than quartz-halogen lights, which does not comply with the federal motor vehicle safety standard, if any, established for such component, device or substance.



Posted by: tazoez

not full version but you get the drift



Posted by: Wolfman

[Andy Rooney]"Didja ever wonder why the guys who do all this silly stuff to make their cars more noticeable and attract attention are the first ones to whine about being picked on and singled out when a cop notices them gives them that attention?"[/Andy Rooney]



Posted by: dcs2244

Quote:
Originally Posted by kttref
My ricer makes awesome mashed potatoes...oh wait, that's a different type.
I had the same thought! But I use a food mill. I guess I'm just getting in touch with my "inner chef".



Posted by: Officer Dunngeon

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
Wow! This whole time I thought the term ricer was some kind of secret code between police officers to make an arrest of some sort.
No, an example of secret cop code would be "crashing the amber." I think it originated in San Jose, CA.



Posted by: Officer Dunngeon

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
Wow! I have seen cars like that but I thought there where some kind of show car and those were called modifiers. Man if that is the case I need to get out more often. I appriciate the definition.
I thought they were simply referred to as shitboxes?

Quote:
Can a ricer get a ticket? Or are they excempt because of there uniqueness and style.
No, they get beatings for that... at least, they should.



Posted by: copcreamer

This is your car on rice. . . any questions. . .?



Posted by: tazoez

Quote:
Originally Posted by copcreamer
This is your car on rice. . . any questions. . .?
OK, SOMEONE HAS WAYYYY TOO MUCH MONEY!!!!



Posted by: Irish Wampanoag

A rice burner is the tern used for motorcycles that are of Asian design. Pork fried rice "NO! Substitutions!!!"



Posted by: tazoez

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irish Wampanoag
A rice burner is the tern used for motorcycles that are of Asian design. Pork fried rice "NO! Substitutions!!!"
I thought that was crotch rocket?
"But I want the Pork Lo Mein!!!"



Posted by: Andy0921

copcreamer, I was just going to post that I found it on google images.



Posted by: jasonbr

I always thought it was funny when people add a spoiler to an import. The whole point of a rear spoiler is to add downforce to the rear of a car and add traction to a rear wheel drive car. When an import (front wheel drive) car has a rear spoiler, it increases traction to the rear wheels - which, according to physics, must reduce traction to the front wheels. It just doesn't make sense!



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by copcreamer
This is your car on rice. . . any questions. . .?
What on god's earth would posses some one to this to there car. I dont even think that thing is street legal. I cant beleive some one would actually drive this car around. It looks like a space ship. WOW!! just when you think you seen it all.



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by tazoez
not full version but you get the drift
Ok! I get it, but suppose you see an older guy in a so called ricer car, say he's about 48 years old with gray hair would you pull him over and give him a ticket.



Posted by: Tango

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
Ok! I get it, but suppose you see an older guy in a so called ricer car, say he's about 48 years old with gray hair would you pull him over and give him a ticket.

Yup, I have done it



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tango
Yup, I have done it
Ok! fair enogh, but wouldn't it make you think why is a 49 year old gray man driving a ricer? Maybe he's car broke down and he was using his sons car to get to work wouldn't you at least consider not ticketing him.



Posted by: djgj200

Quote:
Originally Posted by tazoez
OK, SOMEONE HAS WAYYYY TOO MUCH MONEY!!!!
If you saw some of the added features on the Fast and the Furious DVD, they say that most people put $10,000 into those cars. Yeah, I would say too much money. I could do a lot better things with $10,000.



Posted by: frank

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
Ok! fair enogh, but wouldn't it make you think why is a 49 year old gray man driving a ricer? Maybe he's car broke down and he was using his sons car to get to work wouldn't you at least consider not ticketing him.
Does it matter why? If someone is breaking the law by doing something (or by mere operation in itself, in the case of 90/7 or 90/16), a police officer will educate you...sooner or later.



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by frank
Does it matter why? If someone is breaking the law by doing something (or by mere operation in itself, in the case of 90/7 or 90/16), a police officer will educate you...sooner or later.
I guess you are right it does not matter but I would think at least a police officer would let the 49 year old off with a warning and would at least caution him about the kind of car he was driving (ricer) as you so call it. I know ignorace of the law is no excuse but I would think the officer would at least point it out to the 49 year old especially if the 49 year old did not know he was driving a (ricer) car becasue he needed to get to work and at the time and his sons car was the only thing available to him to be able to get to work. Wouldn't an officer at least consider it before writing it up.



Posted by: frank

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
I guess you are right it does not matter but I would think at least a police officer would let the 49 year old off with a warning and would at least caution him about the kind of car he was driving (ricer) as you so call it. I know ignorace of the law is no excuse but I would think the officer would at least point it out to the 49 year old especially if the 49 year old did not know he was driving a (ricer) car becasue he needed to get to work and at the time and his sons car was the only thing available to him to be able to get to work. Wouldn't an officer at least consider it before writing it up.
Honestly, the only person that can answer that question for you is the officer that gave you the ticket...if you explained it to them, it appears that the ticket was your answer to that question.



Posted by: Officer Dunngeon

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
I guess you are right it does not matter but I would think at least a police officer would let the 49 year old off with a warning and would at least caution him about the kind of car he was driving (ricer) as you so call it. I know ignorace of the law is no excuse but I would think the officer would at least point it out to the 49 year old especially if the 49 year old did not know he was driving a (ricer) car becasue he needed to get to work and at the time and his sons car was the only thing available to him to be able to get to work. Wouldn't an officer at least consider it before writing it up.
Ha ha ha.

He should just be beaten for being stupid enough to get behind the wheel of one of those clown cars anyway. Don't you agree?



Posted by: Unregistered

Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer Dunngeon
Ha ha ha.

He should just be beaten for being stupid enough to get behind the wheel of one of those clown cars anyway. Don't you agree?
Ok! Maybe he should, but it was the only car that was available to him at the time and he really needed to go to work. So he made a mistake with out wanting to make one the guy was just trying to get to work not drive to work in a so called ricer car.



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by frank
Honestly, the only person that can answer that question for you is the officer that gave you the ticket...if you explained it to them, it appears that the ticket was your answer to that question.
The reason for my question was when he handed me the ticket he shock his head and said ricer. I was going to get out of the car and ask him what's a ricer and tought he was insulting me but I thought I better not I allready got this ticket and better leave things alone. On top of that I was late for work what a day!! Ticket say's mofied exhaust and blue somg device. What ever that means! I have a court date on the 23th of this month!



Posted by: Andy0921

You Might Be A Ricer If…
--------------------------------------------------- The following submissions to the list are from Chris (GreenMitsuE1)------------



Posted by: Officer Dunngeon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Ok! Maybe he should, but it was the only car that was available to him at the time and he really needed to go to work. So he made a mistake with out wanting to make one the guy was just trying to get to work not drive to work in a so called ricer car.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
The reason for my question was when he handed me the ticket he shock his head and said ricer. I was going to get out of the car and ask him what's a ricer and tought he was insulting me but I thought I better not I allready got this ticket and better leave things alone. On top of that I was late for work what a day!! Ticket say's mofied exhaust and blue somg device. What ever that means! I have a court date on the 23th of this month!
You only get a ticket if you break the law. It doesn't matter if you're just walking down the street wearing a clown suit - if there's a law that says it's illegal to don clown suits, then you are going to get a ticket. When there's a law that says you can't drive over a certain speed limit and a law that says you cannot make certain modifications to a motor vehicle, then you are subject to whatever punishment you have coming to you under those laws if you break them.

However, I think that's all irrelavent anyway; you already know all that stuff. It seems to me that you just like playing with the piggies.



Posted by: kttref

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
The reason for my question was when he handed me the ticket he shock his head and said ricer. I was going to get out of the car and ask him what's a ricer and tought he was insulting me but I thought I better not I allready got this ticket and better leave things alone. On top of that I was late for work what a day!! Ticket say's mofied exhaust and blue somg device. What ever that means! I have a court date on the 23th of this month!

Think about it as a cop would...remember, we get lied to EVERYDAY..what would one 49 yr old dude say to get out of a ticket....we don't care whose car it may be, if you were driving it you are at fault. Again, remember, people lie to cops every day of the week, we don't know that you would be any different.



Posted by: DodgeRam

RICER: (ri-cer')
(Ricer: from the latin word Ricarius meaning to suck at everything you attempt)

A person who makes unecessary modifications to their most often import car (hence the term "rice") to make it (mostly make it look) faster. The most common modifications are (but not limited to):

- Huge exhaust that serves no purpose but to make the car louder
- Large spoiler on the back that looks like something Boeing made for the 747
- Lots of after-market company stickers they don't have parts from, but must be cool
- Expensive rims that usually cost more than the car itself
- Bodykit to make the car appear lower, usually accented with chicken wire
- Clear tail lights and corner signals
- A "performace intake"- a tube that feeds cold air to their engine usually located in areas of excessive heat (behind or on top of the engine)
- Most of these riced cars (a.k.a. rice rockets or rice burners) are imports; Honda Civics, Accords, Integras, CRXs, RSXs, Del Sols Mitsubishi Eclipses, Lancers, Subaru Imprezas, however there are some domestics such as Chevrolet Caviliers, Dodge Neons, Ford Focus; small, slow, economy cars designed specifically to go slow. Please note that some Supras, Skylines, WRX's and other higher performance imports are designed to go fast, and are therfore not always considered rice. It really depends on the severity of the case.

The "ricer" attempts to make their car "performance" by adding the modifications listed above. These ricers are not confined to any one ethnic group or color, however different ethnic groups are known for certain styles.
Honda Civics with big spoilers and 4" exhaust tips are considered to be ricers.



Posted by: Wolfman

Quote:
Ticket say's mofied exhaust and blue somg device. What ever that means.
That makes 2 of us.



Posted by: 94c

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
Ticket say's mofied exhaust and blue somg device. What ever that means!
I believe the ticket says "Blues song device"

That would be a mofied car stereo with very high decimals



Posted by: JoninNH

When I had a bad day at work, I used to use one of those stress toys...
Then I found that blowing $50 of ammo at the range worked too...
Now I just come to Ask A Cop to laugh at people.
Does that make me a bad person?



Posted by: Andy0921

already posted that defination DodgeRam



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer Dunngeon
You only get a ticket if you break the law. It doesn't matter if you're just walking down the street wearing a clown suit - if there's a law that says it's illegal to don clown suits, then you are going to get a ticket. When there's a law that says you can't drive over a certain speed limit and a law that says you cannot make certain modifications to a motor vehicle, then you are subject to whatever punishment you have coming to you under those laws if you break them.

However, I think that's all irrelavent anyway; you already know all that stuff. It seems to me that you just like playing with the piggies.
He pulled me over becaue of the exhaust I was not breaking any laws or speeding. The ticket says modified exhaust and blue smog device.

Here is a picture of the car I was driving and the engine bay. Now here is a picture of my 17 year old son's car with a picture of the motor. I took it to take it to court to see what blue smog device he was talking about. Because all I see is Yellow. I just dont get.










Posted by: csauce777

lol...I would have written you too. Nice interior...you definately have met the definition of a ricer I would say. Thats a sweet front bumber you have too.



Posted by: BSP268

lol!!! two words "sh!@ box" haha



Posted by: Officer Dunngeon

Like, omigod!!! That's what I said like 3 pages ago! LOL

Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer Dunngeon
I thought they were simply referred to as shitboxes?




Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by csauce777
lol...I would have written you too. Nice interior...you definately have met the definition of a ricer I would say. Thats a sweet front bumber you have too.
Ok! this is not my car this is my sons car. I used it becasue my car would not start and I needed to get to work. I did not want to be late so I used his car since he goes to high school and school is out right now. He bought this car with his hard earned money. What can Itell you all I wanted to do was to get to work so I would not be late.
I am confussed becasue the ticket says blue smog device and for the life of me I can not find what the officer was talking about. As far as the front bumper goes there's one sitting in my garge that is going to put on. That kid is a pain in my you know what!



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by BSP268
lol!!! two words "sh!@ box" haha
Ok! now imagine a 49 year old gray hair man driving this car. Would you not say to your self. Now what's wrong with this picture?. I allways thought police officers would access the situation before proceding on a write up. I wonder If I was the laughing stock when he got back to his department.

I am taking it to court becasue the ticket says blue smog device and modified exhaust. I still dont see what blue somog device he was talking about.



Posted by: Wolfman

Just looking at the pic, I notice there are no amber reflectors up front, just for starters - you say that you weren't breaking the law yet the exhaust is modified, well I guess you were breaking the law then. I'm no emissions inspector but I would guess the CAI pipe is not Massachusetts emissions compliant (no matter what it said on the label).

It really doesn't matter if it's your car or someone elses, or if you're 19 or 49, you drive around town in a piece of crap like that don't get all cranky and bewildered when you get pulled over and ticketed. Yeah, the guy assessed the car, saw the violations, and put your tax dollars to work. Boo hoo. You definitely came to the wrong place to find a shoulder to cry on, pal.

I think the 49 year old guy driving the car would be the laughing stock when he pulled up to work in that thing. Seriously. I'd rather walk, take the bus, ride a bicycle, or just call in sick.



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman
Just looking at the pic, I notice there are no amber reflectors up front, just for starters - you say that you weren't breaking the law yet the exhaust is modified, well I guess you were breaking the law then. I'm no emissions inspector but I would guess the CAI pipe is not Massachusetts emissions compliant (no matter what it said on the label).

It really doesn't matter if it's your car or someone elses, or if you're 19 or 49, you drive around town in a piece of crap like that don't get all cranky and bewildered when you get pulled over and ticketed. Yeah, the guy assessed the car, saw the violations, and put your tax dollars to work. Boo hoo. You definitely came to the wrong place to find a shoulder to cry on, pal.

I think the 49 year old guy driving the car would be the laughing stock when he pulled up to work in that thing. Seriously. I'd rather walk, take the bus, ride a bicycle, or just call in sick.
Man you guys are tough!



Posted by: Wolfman

Maybe this would be more your speed:
http://www.selfesteem.com/default.aspx



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman
Maybe this would be more your speed:
http://www.selfesteem.com/default.aspx
Man you guys are tough and mean!



Posted by: musclehead1

HE SHOULD HAVE GAVE YOU ONE OF THESE...LOL





Posted by: dcs2244

It doesn't matter...you violated the law by operating an unlawfully altered motor vehicle. I'm a 48 yoa non-grey guy, and I know better...as you should. Pay the fine and STFU. And give your kid a Punch-in-the-Head (tm) for putting you in this position.

Perhaps the "blue smog" refers to 'excessive smoke"...to wit, an oil burner. Genius.



Posted by: Officer Dunngeon

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
Man you guys are tough and mean!




Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcs2244
It doesn't matter...you violated the law by operating an unlawfully altered motor vehicle. I'm a 48 yoa non-grey guy, and I know better...as you should. Pay the fine and STFU. And give your kid a Punch-in-the-Head (tm) for putting you in this position.

Perhaps the "blue smog" refers to 'excessive smoke"...to wit, an oil burner. Genius.
It does matter. It was the only way I had to get to work and I am not rich like you guys. I know you guys make bank but there was no need for me to get a ticket for an honest mistake. Oh! don't worry my kid is up the creek without a paddle right now. I will not Punch him in the head becasue it's aginst law they call that child abuse. Here you are telling me that I broke the law so I deserved the ticket and here you are wanting me to break the law by punching my kid? How much sense does that make?

By the way what's STFU!



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by musclehead1
HE SHOULD HAVE GAVE YOU ONE OF THESE...LOL

I cant see the picture so Idont what you are refering to.



Posted by: Wolfman

You didn't get the ticket for an honest mistake.

You got the ticket for violating a law enacted by those who represent the citizens of the Commonwealth. The same principles that allow the citizens to enact and enfoce laws also give you the right to complain about the laws. This does not, however, give you any right to only comply with those laws that you feel are appropriate and dismiss those which you feel are not. The ultimate determination of responsibility for such a failure to comply lies with our courts, and that's where you should be complaining, not here.

As far as those here are concerned, the cold, hard bottom line is that you were wrong, and are being called to task for your infraction.

You've said your piece. Now get over it.



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman
You didn't get the ticket for an honest mistake.

You got the ticket for violating a law enacted by those who represent the citizens of the Commonwealth. The same principles that allow the citizens to enact and enfoce laws also give you the right to complain about the laws. This does not, however, give you any right to only comply with those laws that you feel are appropriate and dismiss those which you feel are not. The ultimate determination of responsibility for such a failure to comply lies with our courts, and that's where you should be complaining, not here.

As far as those here are concerned, the cold, hard bottom line is that you were wrong, and are being called to task for your infraction.

You've said your piece. Now get over it.
You are right! I just tought maybe common sense would be used by the officer and would have been nice enough to at least ask! but then I again Idid not use much common sense when I drove the car either.



Posted by: Wolfman

The officer did use common sense. He did the job he was paid to do, just like the clerk at the corner store, the waiter in the restaurant, the contruction worker, and the doctor. I'm sure the gas station clerk thinks that the prices are out of control, but do you gripe to them about not giving you a break?

You simply are emotional becasue you were the source of his attention. You're only human. How many other times have you seen someone pulled over and championed their cause on the internet? None, I'll bet. You're making this personal, and unless you were some sort of an asshole, it is not personal. It is a job. It pays bills, it puts kids through school, it funds a comfortable retirement in one's twilight years. That is what is plainly obvious to everyone here, and why you are getting the attention (once more) that you seek.



Posted by: rwdsw20

Honestly I just wanted to know what a ricer was since the officer mentioned it when he was walking back to his crusier. I wanted to understand. That's all. Nothing more, nothing less.



Posted by: TypeX

I'll send you the money for the ticket via paypal, if you shut the hell up and stop responding.



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by TypeX
I'll send you the money for the ticket via paypal, if you shut the hell up and stop responding.
Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha. Thanks but I dont want the money. All I wanted was an honest response. You guys are the best.



Posted by: SOT

I'm calling troll on the whole thing. I'm betting either one of the ricer idiots playing grown up or just some general idiot playing games.



Posted by: JoninNH

I think it's time Gil blocks some IP addresses...



Posted by: bbelichick

Quote:
Originally Posted by djgj200
If you saw some of the added features on the Fast and the Furious DVD, they say that most people put $10,000 into those cars. Yeah, I would say too much money. I could do a lot better things with $10,000.
If you are actually watching Fast and the Furious, or even more horrendous the F-ing special features on said bad movie...Then you have too much time on your hands.



Posted by: Wolfman





Posted by: rwdsw20

Ok I went to court yesturday on the ricer ticket and the judge dismissed the the ticket on the so called ricer. I did not have to pay anything on it.

1st she said that that the officer wrote the ticket incorrectly when he put blue smog device. He abioulsy did not know what a intake is which are legal no matter what color the are. (he,he)

2nd I took the picutures of the car with me and showed themt to judge, and I brought the car to court with me.

3rd the judge asked me why was I driving such a horrible car. I explained my situation to her she actually laughed about it and said. "Ticket dismissed"...



Posted by: JoninNH






Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoninNH

You abioulsy dont make a good police officer or have good common sense because before you make accusations you need to have all your facts stright or in order. A good officer will get all the facts first before making accusations. You sir have called me a liar without any proof what so ever. So to prove how incompetant you really are I am going to take a picture of the ticket and a picture of the paper the clerk gave me at the court that states ticket diss-missed.



Posted by: SOT

Yes please do that.



Posted by: TypeX

Jesus, no one cares about your stupid ticket (whether you were found responsible or not). It was funny for the first 2 pages when you were making a fool out of yourself and now it's really sad. Our lives didn't stop when you were issued your ticket and just now re-start with the result of your court appearance.
Congratulations you beat your ticket! (Which you wouldn't have had if you weren't driving that POS anyway.) On a personal note, type your responses in MSWord and then click spell check. Oh and that "ABSOLUT BULLSH*T" picture is one of the funniest pics I've seen in a long time lol



Posted by: jasonbr

I want to see the picture... do it! do it!....



Posted by: Officer Dunngeon

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
You abioulsy dont make a good police officer or have good common sense because before you make accusations you need to have all your facts stright or in order. A good officer will get all the facts first before making accusations. You sir have called me a liar without any proof what so ever. So to prove how incompetant you really are I am going to take a picture of the ticket and a picture of the paper the clerk gave me at the court that states ticket diss-missed.




Posted by: Barbrady

Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer Dunngeon
Thats just wrong, lol.



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by TypeX
Jesus, no one cares about your stupid ticket (whether you were found responsible or not). It was funny for the first 2 pages when you were making a fool out of yourself and now it's really sad. Our lives didn't stop when you were issued your ticket and just now re-start with the result of your court appearance.
Congratulations you beat your ticket! (Which you wouldn't have had if you weren't driving that POS anyway.) On a personal note, type your responses in MSWord and then click spell check. Oh and that "ABSOLUT BULLSH*T" picture is one of the funniest pics I've seen in a long time lol
I care! and you know why I care! Because it was a bougus writen ticket to begin with and I proved that it was bogus and I won! Just becasue it looks like a ricer does not mean it's one. Sure it needs a paint job and the interior color does not match but the car car legaly be driven in the USA. And all I was really saying is that an officer should not be fast with the pen. Assess first then write the ticket later if needs to be.

You are just jealous cause I won!!! (he,he)



Posted by: rwdsw20

Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer Dunngeon

Wow! that picture is so wrong on so many levels!



Posted by: Wolfman

Still waiting to see the picture of your ticket and the "dismissed"---which is odd, because I have only heard it referred to as "not responsible"...but a bullshitter wouldn't necessarily know that now, would he?

Smells like...maybe some pwnage coming?

Also...dude...learn to frickin' spell. Christ, I need an ibuprofen after decyphering your heartless massacre of the English language.



Posted by: TypeX

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwdsw20
You are just jealous cause I won!!! (he,he)
As I said before, Congrats.
However, I dont ever plan on being in a ricer so I'm not that worried about getting one of those tickets.
It wasn't bogus, I'm sure the officer... forget it. I'm not going to start this up AGAIN.

I'm happy for you.



Posted by: Wolfman

...Still waiting...



Posted by: djgj200

I know this has been inactive for a 4 weeks or so but I thought I ought to post this since it went along with this thread so well.



Posted by: MSP75

The Not Responsible means absolutely nada. The courts let child diddlers, druggies, etc, off easy all the time. Does that mean touching little kids is okay? So, keep it up rice lover and enjoy the frequent trips to court. I certainly do.





ma police, boston ma police, massachusetts police, massachusetts police, mass state police, mass police, ma, mass, massachusetts, massachusetts, massachutes, massachusetts law, massachusetts polece, police, officer, police officer, cops, police gear, law enforcement, police duty gear, state police, sheriff, law, police supply, police agency directory, police agency, police department, traffic officer, police dept, state trooper, dispatcher, massachusetts county sheriff, massachusetts sheriff, massachusetts department of corrections, ma doc, doc, dept of corrections, police information, civil service, ma civil service, massachusetts crime, police training, police academy, ma police academy, massachusetts officers, masscop, masscops, mpa, bpa, ibpoa, police association, massachusetts police news, massachusetts crime news, mass most wanted, police career information, police patrol, police administration, police books, crime scene training, police discussion, crime discussions, cops

About MassCops, the home for Massachusetts law enforcement.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network opened in 1998 and is now a part of the New England Police Network The site is a pro-police discussion forum intended for sworn police officers and civilian law enforcement officials as well as those interested in pursuing a career in law enforcement here in Massachusetts.

The goal of The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network is to provide an informal network of law enforcement officials here in Massachusetts for educational and informational purposes.

The forum covers many topics such as Police Related News Articles, Agency & Profession Discussions, Police Training as well as Law Enforcement Career Information.

The Massachusetts Law Enforcement Network and The New England Police Network (NEPN) and it's network sites are privately owned websites/domains and are not affiliated with or endorsed by any government association or agency.

MassCops (masscops.com) and (masscop.com) are privately owned are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Massachusetts Coalition of Police (masscop.org)



vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2008 - Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser

3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 49 50 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108